Hello,
I needed the first-kind Bessel function, so I tried using the scilib library. However, I found that the function scilib::math::bessel::j_nu(nu: f64, z: Complex64) -> Complex64 lacked sufficient precision, and the function scilib::math::bessel::j_n(n: i32, x: f64) -> f64 produced completely inaccurate, diverging results.
Switching to puruspe::bessel::Jn resolved the issue, and I’m satisfied with its higher precision compared to scilib.
That said, I’m still using scilib’s j_nu function for complex inputs, but I’d like to fully transition to puruspe if possible. Do you have any plans to support a complex input version of the first-kind Bessel function in puruspe?
Thank you for providing such an excellent library!
Hello,
I needed the first-kind Bessel function, so I tried using the scilib library. However, I found that the function
scilib::math::bessel::j_nu(nu: f64, z: Complex64) -> Complex64lacked sufficient precision, and the functionscilib::math::bessel::j_n(n: i32, x: f64) -> f64produced completely inaccurate, diverging results.Switching to
puruspe::bessel::Jnresolved the issue, and I’m satisfied with its higher precision compared toscilib.That said, I’m still using
scilib’sj_nufunction for complex inputs, but I’d like to fully transition topuruspeif possible. Do you have any plans to support a complex input version of the first-kind Bessel function inpuruspe?Thank you for providing such an excellent library!