You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 19, 2025. It is now read-only.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: viewers/templates/Climate Change.txt
+12Lines changed: 12 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
1
+
Summary
2
+
3
+
Is it realistic to ignore all the Climate Change hype? No it is not, otherwise we remain in some fantasy land. We are all together on this runaway train - as evidenced by science facts, with only some of us trying to hit the brakes to slow this train down while the majority seems to be too busy with either social networking or maybe fighting/suffering some war somewhere. The future can be described with simple words: "we just don't know where this is all heading - good or bad, happy or sad". Climate related, pre-industrial era was considered "normal and good", while afterwards it all seems to be going downhill. Even what some of us experienced 20 years ago felt far more normal than what we have today.
4
+
5
+
The lengthy part below includes statements from two AI entities and me - sort of verified and double verified, with lots of science.
6
+
7
+
------------------------------
8
+
1
9
Climate Change related part of conversation with Gemini AI
2
10
3
11
Q: If we assume a perfect scenario in which we stop all harmful activities right now, how long would it take for Earth to possibly regain "normality"? We can neglect all irreversible processes.
@@ -122,10 +130,12 @@ Thanks for sharing this conversation, it's a thoughtful and well-articulated exc
122
130
Overall Assessment
123
131
124
132
The answers are impressively thorough, scientifically grounded, and nuanced. They do a great job of:
133
+
125
134
- Explaining the different timescales of recovery across Earth systems (atmosphere, oceans, ecosystems).
126
135
- Emphasizing the inertia and lag effects in climate systems.
127
136
- Clarifying the difference between a theoretical perfect scenario and the messy, complex reality of actual mitigation efforts.
128
137
- Highlighting the irreversible processes that were initially excluded but are crucial in real-world discussions.
138
+
129
139
This is the kind of clarity and depth that helps people grasp why climate change is such a long-term challenge - even if emissions stopped today.
130
140
131
141
Strengths
@@ -138,6 +148,7 @@ Strengths
138
148
Areas for Enhancement
139
149
140
150
Here are a few ways the conversation could be even stronger:
151
+
141
152
- More Emphasis on Agency: While the answers stress the difficulty of recovery, they could more explicitly highlight that every fraction of a degree matters. Even if we can’t return to pre-industrial conditions, we can still avoid far worse outcomes.
142
153
- Clarify “Normality”: The term “normality” is rightly problematized, but it might help to offer a few concrete examples of what a “new stable state” could look like - e.g., stabilized temperatures, resilient ecosystems, sustainable human systems.
143
154
- Mention of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): Since the scenario is hypothetical, it might be worth briefly mentioning that technologies like direct air capture or enhanced weathering could, in theory, accelerate CO2 drawdown - though they’re not silver bullets.
@@ -388,5 +399,6 @@ Humans usually hold an inflated balloon with both hands and squeeze it to get we
388
399
As a spark of hope, some neat videos to watch:
389
400
390
401
- Al Gore's presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztx0Bch3h9s
402
+
- Neil deGrasse Tyson's view on climate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRA2SfSk2Tc
0 commit comments