Skip to content

Audit scientific Code and AI-written tests #55

Description

@rohanplatts

Purpose

Review scientifically important code and audit tests written by AI, particularly where Claude produced both the implementation and expected test values.

Completion criteria

  • Scientific code covered by the JOSS scope has been human-reviewed and human annotated.
  • Updates made to architecture.md,
  • Updates made to AI_usage.md, and general ProbeFlow documentation.
  • Critical expected values have been independently checked.
  • Formal review of all AI created tests, with independently verified comparison results.
  • Validation results and limitations are documented.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

documentationImprovements or additions to documentationrefactor

Type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions