Replies: 1 comment
|
The difference between those two examples is intentional and comes down to CSS layout rather than different table options. TanStack Table is headless: the core engine only calculates numeric sizes ( Why the examples behave differently
Using performant resizing with full-width tablesIf you want a table that starts at full width but allows unconstrained column resizing without shrinking neighboring columns:
This gives you full-width layout initially while letting resized columns push the table width out into horizontal scroll instead of stealing width from adjacent columns. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
https://tanstack.com/table/latest/docs/framework/react/examples/column-resizing-performant
https://tanstack.com/table/latest/docs/framework/react/examples/full-width-resizable-table?panel=sandbox
In the "column-resizing-performant" example, resizing a column
only affects the active column and changes the total table width.
In the "full-width-resizable-table" example, resizing a column
redistributes width across all columns, keeping the table width fixed.
Is this difference intentional?
If so, could the docs clarify which options control:
If not, this might be an inconsistency between examples.
All reactions