Best practice on handling PLAN.md? #554
-
|
By default it just writes to project root, and it'll be easily overwritten by different PRs. Is it the intended use case and the purpose is to review the plan in PRs? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
The plan is used to help guide you and help you iterate on what exactly you want developed and how you want it developed. I then think it also becomes a nice artifact for the agent to use throughout implementation. This becomes more important the more effort the agent has to do. This is less important, the smaller the scope of work is. The same can be said for reviews. I have started to stick the plan inside of my reviews. I'm figuring out how to do this as a native capability in plannotator. still unsure of a reliable way for all users. I don't think you need to put plans inside the repo; it depends on your process.
What harness do you use? You should be able to configure where the plans go |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

This is probably the best next version /simplest thing to ship. Otherwise, there are some things that aren't really intuitive when trying to figure out the right plan to automatically add to a review. All plans are always stored at
~/.plannotator/plansand I could ask the agent to just search there... But I think a more intuitive path is going to be some smart linking between the files and current sessions.