Proposal: Consider storing container name in Container struct

[xHozey]

Currently, the Container struct stores the container ID, short ID, image, exposed ports, and runtime state, but it does not include the container name.

I was wondering whether the omission of the container name is intentional. In some scenarios, having the name available directly on the struct could be useful, particularly for debugging and improving log readability.

Before opening a PR, I wanted to ask whether this was intentionally excluded to keep the abstraction minimal, or if adding a name string field to the struct would be considered acceptable.