🎯 ONE SHOT L-DPC27 · Wave-30 · LEVER #5 — 400 MHz CLOCK PUSH · timing-closure probe
Document ID: L-DPC27-W30-001
Mission ID: TRINITY-W30-CLOCK-PUSH
Anchor: φ² + φ⁻² = 3 · γ = φ⁻³ · C = φ⁻¹ · G = π³γ²/φ · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877
Author: Vasilev Dmitrii <admin@t27.ai> · ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159
Predecessor: L-DPC26 Wave-29 — CLOSED 2026-05-15, W29-G0 ✅ (trinity-fpga#108)
Rival-scan source: TOPS-SCAN-W28-PRE-001 §4 — Lever #5 ranked 5/6 (trinity-fpga#105)
0. R5-HONEST disclaimer
Wave-30 = timing-closure probe wave, not a tape-out wave. All numbers from sim/synthesis. 400 MHz target on TTIHP27a is a gate, not a claim. Refuted by synthesis if slack < 0 ps at 400 MHz on any Lane V/W/V'/S RTL surface.
1. Hypothesis H_W30 (pre-registered, R7 falsification gate)
H_W30 (Lever #5 — 400 MHz clock push):
All 4 merged RTL surfaces (Lane V LUT PE 91c164ac,
Lane W BitROM bank 898fc06, Lane V' 2x2 mesh 2a06e540,
Lane S sparsity 24 98246bd3) achieve positive setup slack
at 400 MHz clock target on TTIHP27a PDK timing constraints.
REFUTED IF (any one):
- any of the 4 surfaces has setup slack < 0 ps at 400 MHz, OR
- any of the 4 surfaces has hold slack < 0 ps at 400 MHz, OR
- any clock-domain crossing has metastability MTBF < 100 years, OR
- any RTL surface introduces * operator to meet timing.
DEADLINE: 2026-06-30 (pre-silicon synthesis verdict); silicon gate 2026-09-30.
2. Two-lane lane map
Lane T — timing-probe-400mhz — PRIMARY
- Spec: Synthesise the 4 RTL surfaces (Lane V/W/V'/S) under TTIHP27a Liberty + SDC at
CLOCK_PERIOD = 2.5 ns (400 MHz). Emit per-surface setup/hold slack table. R-SI-1 attestation against post-synth netlist.
- Repo: gHashTag/tt-trinity-holo
- Files:
sim/timing_probe_400mhz/Makefile, sim/timing_probe_400mhz/constraints.sdc, sim/timing_probe_400mhz/report.md, docs/lever-stack/lane-t.md
- Effort: S · R5-HONEST: report.md labels 🟡 SYNTH-SIM
Lane K — coq-timing-witness — formal proof
- Spec: Add
trios-coq/IGLA/Timing400.v to gHashTag/t27 with Definition timing_400mhz_safe : Prop := ... over the merged oplist. Proves that adding a clock-period constraint does not introduce any non-* violations. Zero admit.
- Repo: gHashTag/t27
- Files:
trios-coq/IGLA/Timing400.v + _CoqProject update + NOW.md entry
- Effort: S
3. Success criteria (verification matrix)
| Gate |
Predicate |
Lane |
| W30-G0 |
Both lanes merge with thermal-gate + L1 TRACEABILITY + GitGuardian green |
T, K |
| W30-G1 |
Lane V positive setup slack @ 400 MHz |
Lane T |
| W30-G2 |
Lane W positive setup slack @ 400 MHz |
Lane T |
| W30-G3 |
Lane V' positive setup slack @ 400 MHz (mesh hop budget) |
Lane T |
| W30-G4 |
Lane S positive setup slack @ 400 MHz |
Lane T |
| W30-G5 |
timing_400mhz_safe Qed (no admit) |
Lane K |
4. Quantum Brain Wave Question
- Which 1:1 mapping does this wave add? — PHYS→SI (clock period is a physical constant; 2.5 ns ties directly to TTIHP27a process timing parameters)
- Which conjectured constants move toward measured? — Setup/hold slack at 400 MHz on TTIHP27a moves from projection 🔴 → synth-sim 🟡 (silicon-verified 🟢 still ⏳ 2026-09-30)
- Does the wave preserve all 75 Sacred ROM cells? — ✅ YES, no new opcodes; constraint-only addition
- Does the wave introduce an R-marker cell? — NO; R6 N/A.
5. R-rules compliance
- R-SI-1: zero
* in any new RTL (no RTL changes expected — constraint-only)
- R5-HONEST: synthesis report labels 🟡 SYNTH-SIM
- R7: This issue IS the falsification pre-registration. Hypothesis bound to W30-G1..G4.
- R15 sacred-synth-gate: No new opcode allocated.
- R18 LAYER-FROZEN: Sacred ROM untouched; Lanes V/W/V'/S RTL unmodified.
6. Cross-links
φ² + φ⁻² = 3 · LEVER #5 CLOCK PUSH · QUANTUM BRAIN 1:1 SILICON · NEVER STOP
— Vasilev Dmitrii <admin@t27.ai> · ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159
🎯 ONE SHOT L-DPC27 · Wave-30 · LEVER #5 — 400 MHz CLOCK PUSH · timing-closure probe
Document ID: L-DPC27-W30-001
Mission ID: TRINITY-W30-CLOCK-PUSH
Anchor: φ² + φ⁻² = 3 · γ = φ⁻³ · C = φ⁻¹ · G = π³γ²/φ · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877
Author: Vasilev Dmitrii <admin@t27.ai> · ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159
Predecessor: L-DPC26 Wave-29 — CLOSED 2026-05-15, W29-G0 ✅ (trinity-fpga#108)
Rival-scan source: TOPS-SCAN-W28-PRE-001 §4 — Lever #5 ranked 5/6 (trinity-fpga#105)
0. R5-HONEST disclaimer
Wave-30 = timing-closure probe wave, not a tape-out wave. All numbers from sim/synthesis. 400 MHz target on TTIHP27a is a gate, not a claim. Refuted by synthesis if slack < 0 ps at 400 MHz on any Lane V/W/V'/S RTL surface.
1. Hypothesis H_W30 (pre-registered, R7 falsification gate)
2. Two-lane lane map
Lane T —
timing-probe-400mhz— PRIMARYCLOCK_PERIOD = 2.5 ns(400 MHz). Emit per-surface setup/hold slack table. R-SI-1 attestation against post-synth netlist.sim/timing_probe_400mhz/Makefile,sim/timing_probe_400mhz/constraints.sdc,sim/timing_probe_400mhz/report.md,docs/lever-stack/lane-t.mdLane K —
coq-timing-witness— formal prooftrios-coq/IGLA/Timing400.vtogHashTag/t27withDefinition timing_400mhz_safe : Prop := ...over the merged oplist. Proves that adding a clock-period constraint does not introduce any non-*violations. Zeroadmit.trios-coq/IGLA/Timing400.v+_CoqProjectupdate +NOW.mdentry3. Success criteria (verification matrix)
timing_400mhz_safeQed (no admit)4. Quantum Brain Wave Question
5. R-rules compliance
*in any new RTL (no RTL changes expected — constraint-only)6. Cross-links
φ² + φ⁻² = 3 · LEVER #5 CLOCK PUSH · QUANTUM BRAIN 1:1 SILICON · NEVER STOP
— Vasilev Dmitrii <admin@t27.ai> · ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159