Commit c4beffe
test: fix config regression data spelling (#2240)
The lint job on PR #2241 failed in the codespell pre-commit hook because
the new write-preservation regression used "readded" as a sample value.
The same two diagnostics reproduce with codespell 2.4.3 locally.
Use "again" in both the assignment and assertion. The value is arbitrary:
the regression checks the spelling of a removed and recreated option,
so this satisfies lint without changing the behavior under test.
Validation: codespell passes for the three PR files; the affected test
passes on Python 3.14.7; Ruff lint and formatting pass for test_config.py.1 parent 94a591d commit c4beffe
1 file changed
Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
159 | 159 | | |
160 | 160 | | |
161 | 161 | | |
162 | | - | |
163 | | - | |
| 162 | + | |
| 163 | + | |
164 | 164 | | |
165 | 165 | | |
166 | 166 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments