diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 8e3bf99..e086ecd 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ If you use [herdr](https://herdr.dev) (an agent multiplexer for the terminal), p
 
 | Paper | Example | Summary |
 |---|---|---|
-| [Self-Refine](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17651) | [self_refine.py](./examples/papers/self_refine.py) | Generate, self-critique, refine until the critic approves. |
+| [Self-Refine](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17651) | [self_refine.py](./examples/papers/self_refine.py) | One seat: generate, `reflect` (self-critique), refine until its own critique approves. |
 | [Reflexion](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11366) | [reflexion.py](./examples/papers/reflexion.py) | Verbal reflections on test failures accumulate as episodic memory across retries. |
 | [CRITIC](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11738) | [critic.py](./examples/papers/critic.py) | Critiques grounded in external tool runs drive each correction. |
 | [Self-Debug](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05128) | [self_debugging.py](./examples/papers/self_debugging.py) | Explain your own code line by line (rubber duck), then fix. |
diff --git a/examples/papers/README.md b/examples/papers/README.md
index c430b59..821df0c 100644
--- a/examples/papers/README.md
+++ b/examples/papers/README.md
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ and need no clean worktree.
 
 | Score | Paper | The loop on h5i |
 |---|---|---|
-| [`self_refine.py`](self_refine.py) | Self-Refine ([arXiv:2303.17651](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17651)) | generate → critic seat (same model) reviews → revise, until approved. |
+| [`self_refine.py`](self_refine.py) | Self-Refine ([arXiv:2303.17651](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17651)) | one seat: generate → `reflect` (self-feedback) → revise, until its own critique approves. |
 | [`reflexion.py`](reflexion.py) | Reflexion ([arXiv:2303.11366](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11366)) | `verify` as the evaluator; verbal reflections accumulate in an episodic buffer delivered as the revise review. |
 | [`critic.py`](critic.py) | CRITIC ([arXiv:2305.11738](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11738)) | a toolbox of `verify` commands grounds each critique; correct → re-verify. |
 | [`self_debugging.py`](self_debugging.py) | Self-Debug ([arXiv:2304.05128](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05128)) | rubber-duck: explain your own code line by line before revising against the failure. |
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ and need no clean worktree.
 The scores share scaffolding and build on each other:
 
 1. `self_refine` → `reflexion` → `critic` — one worker, three feedback sources
-   (a critic seat, its own reflections, external tools).
+   (its own `reflect` critique, verifier-informed reflections, external tools).
 2. `self_consistency` → `agent_forest` → `multiagent_debate` — from voting to
    debating, same parallel-`ask` skeleton.
 3. `chateval` and `mav_bon` — two ways to judge sealed candidates beyond
diff --git a/examples/papers/self_refine.py b/examples/papers/self_refine.py
index da47207..178b2f7 100644
--- a/examples/papers/self_refine.py
+++ b/examples/papers/self_refine.py
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
 
 One model plays two roles with two prompts: it generates a candidate,
 critiques its own output, then refines against that critique — no external
-signal, no training. h5i forbids a seat from reviewing its own artifact
-(reviews are provenance-tracked turns), so the critic role is a second seat
-pinned to the *same* model: the paper's "self" is the model, not the
-session. The loop stops when the critic approves (the ``APPROVE`` first-line
-convention) or the round budget runs out.
+signal, no training. That maps to a single seat: ``reflect`` is the FEEDBACK
+step, a first-class self-feedback turn recorded as a reflection (never as a
+peer review — reviews stay peer-to-peer in h5i), and ``revise`` is REFINE.
+The loop stops when the agent's own critique approves (the ``APPROVE``
+first-line convention) or the round budget runs out.
 
     python examples/papers/self_refine.py ["<task>"]   # default: implement quicksort with pytest
 """
@@ -24,21 +24,21 @@
 async def main(task: str) -> None:
     async with Conductor(".", "self-refine-demo", launcher="resident", isolation="supervised") as c:
         author = await c.hire("author", runtime="claude", model="claude-haiku-4-5")
-        critic = await c.hire("critic", runtime="claude", model="claude-haiku-4-5")
 
-        # Generate: one independent attempt, then seal the round (review is
-        # a sealed-phase turn).
+        # Generate: one independent attempt, then seal the round.
         artifact = await author.work(task, expect_independent=True)
         await c.freeze()
 
-        # Feedback → refine, until the critic approves or the budget is spent.
+        # Feedback → refine, until the author's own critique approves or the
+        # budget is spent. Reflections create no influence edge — the refined
+        # candidate stays stamped independent.
         refinements = 0
         for _ in range(MAX_ROUNDS):
-            review = await critic.review(artifact)
-            if review.approved:
+            feedback = await author.reflect(artifact)
+            if feedback.approved:
                 break
             refinements += 1
-            artifact = await author.revise(artifact, review)
+            artifact = await author.revise(artifact, feedback)
 
         print(f"refined {refinements} time(s); final candidate {artifact.id}")
 
diff --git a/src/h5i/orchestra/_conductor.py b/src/h5i/orchestra/_conductor.py
index 5bfc885..120b1e2 100644
--- a/src/h5i/orchestra/_conductor.py
+++ b/src/h5i/orchestra/_conductor.py
@@ -643,6 +643,31 @@ async def ask(
             last_value=value,
         )
 
+    async def reflect(self, artifact: Artifact) -> Review:
+        """Critique your OWN submission — the self-feedback turn (Self-Refine's
+        FEEDBACK step).
+
+        Recorded as a ``reflection_submitted`` event, deliberately distinct
+        from peer review: it never counts as review/quorum evidence, and it
+        creates no cross-agent influence edge, so a revision addressing it
+        stays stamped independent. The returned :class:`Review` has
+        ``reviewer == target == <agent>`` and composes with :meth:`revise`
+        unchanged (``review.approved`` uses the same APPROVE first-line
+        convention). Reflecting on a teammate's artifact fails closed — that
+        is a :meth:`review`.
+        """
+        raw = await self._conductor._turn_request(
+            "agent.reflect",
+            {
+                "agent": self.id,
+                "env_id": self.env_id,
+                "artifact": artifact.to_payload(),
+            },
+            self.id,
+            self.env_id,
+        )
+        return Review.from_raw(raw)
+
     async def review(self, artifact: Artifact) -> Review:
         """Review a teammate's artifact (scoped read grant → posted review)."""
         raw = await self._conductor._turn_request(
diff --git a/src/h5i/orchestra/_types.py b/src/h5i/orchestra/_types.py
index 85099b8..5f36c74 100644
--- a/src/h5i/orchestra/_types.py
+++ b/src/h5i/orchestra/_types.py
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ class TurnContext:
     run_id: str
     agent_id: str
     env_id: str
-    kind: str  # "work" | "review" | "revise" | "ask"
+    kind: str  # "work" | "review" | "revise" | "ask" | "reflect"
     target: str | None
     instruction: str
     repo_workdir: str
diff --git a/tests/test_conductor.py b/tests/test_conductor.py
index 340ee46..69f8a21 100644
--- a/tests/test_conductor.py
+++ b/tests/test_conductor.py
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
     Artifact,
     AskParseError,
     ProtocolError,
+    Review,
     TurnContext,
     Verdict,
 )
@@ -99,6 +100,41 @@ async def test_work_round_trip_preserves_unknown_fields():
         await c.close()
 
 
+async def test_reflect_returns_self_review_that_composes_with_revise():
+    mock = MockOrchestra()
+    mock.on("agent.hire", lambda p: {"agent_id": p["name"], "env_id": f"env/{p['name']}/x"})
+    mock.on("agent.work", lambda p: artifact_raw(p["agent"]))
+    reflections = iter(["Needs edge-case tests.", "APPROVE — ready."])
+    mock.on("agent.reflect", lambda p: {
+        "reviewer": p["agent"], "target": p["agent"], "round": 1,
+        "body": next(reflections), "referenced_artifacts": [p["artifact"]["id"]],
+    })
+    mock.on("agent.revise", lambda p: artifact_raw(p["agent"], id_="sha:2"))
+    c = await launch_conductor(mock)
+    try:
+        author = await c.hire("author", runtime="claude")
+        artifact = await author.work("implement quicksort")
+
+        feedback = await author.reflect(artifact)
+        (reflect,) = mock.calls_to("agent.reflect")
+        assert reflect["agent"] == "author"
+        assert reflect["env_id"] == "env/author/x"
+        assert reflect["artifact"]["id"] == artifact.id
+        assert isinstance(feedback, Review)
+        assert feedback.reviewer == feedback.target == "author"
+        assert not feedback.approved
+
+        # The self-review composes with revise unchanged.
+        revised = await author.revise(artifact, feedback)
+        (revise,) = mock.calls_to("agent.revise")
+        assert revise["review"]["reviewer"] == "author"
+        assert revised.id == "sha:2"
+
+        assert (await author.reflect(revised)).approved
+    finally:
+        await c.close()
+
+
 async def test_verify_sealed_from_passes_id_and_parses_seal_fields():
     mock = MockOrchestra()
     mock.on("agent.hire", lambda p: {"agent_id": p["name"], "env_id": f"env/{p['name']}/x"})