From b1b24e60bfe6f69755436caa6b2e4b9da9a26232 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yvette Carlisle Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 04:23:28 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] {"schema":"decodex/commit/1","summary":"Refresh Codex rate-limit reset status","authority":"manual"} --- site/src/content/reset-status/latest.json | 56 +++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/src/content/reset-status/latest.json b/site/src/content/reset-status/latest.json index fa6d6a2b5..c720a60d2 100644 --- a/site/src/content/reset-status/latest.json +++ b/site/src/content/reset-status/latest.json @@ -3,62 +3,38 @@ "question": "Rate limit reset today?", "answer": "no", "confidence": "likely", - "observed_for_date": "2026-06-08", + "observed_for_date": "2026-06-09", "timezone": "Asia/Shanghai", - "generated_at": "2026-06-08T08:19:17Z", + "generated_at": "2026-06-08T20:20:19Z", "source_account": "@thsottiaux", "source_url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux", - "search_url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-07%20until%3A2026-06-09&src=typed_query&f=live", + "search_url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-08%20until%3A2026-06-10&src=typed_query&f=live", "judgment_mode": "ai_semantic_review", - "rationale": "Logged-in Chrome/X profile and broad X search were reachable for the 2026-06-08 Asia/Shanghai watch date. The visible local-day posts included a Codex 10X usage-limit promotion for selected builders, short replies about participation, and unrelated ChatGPT or Codex discussion. The usage-limit promotion is usage-adjacent, but it does not say limits reset, quotas recovered, message caps reset, or users should wait for a reset window. Thread context showed user replies asking about participation or complaining about limits, not a source-account reset signal. An older June 4 usage-limit reset post was visible, but it is outside today's observed date.", + "rationale": "Logged-in Chrome/X search and profile review were reachable for the 2026-06-09 Asia/Shanghai watch date. The visible local-day source-account posts were two replies: one clarified that ChatGPT messages do not burn Codex limits, and one encouraged frequent Codex use in a Codex-or-Claude thread. Third-party replies mentioned limits and resets, but @thsottiaux did not announce a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset window. The run occurred early in the local day, so later posts could change the answer.", "evidence_posts": [ { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 16:19 +08 observation", - "url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-07%20until%3A2026-06-09&src=typed_query&f=live", + "published_at_label": "2026-06-09 04:20 +08 observation", + "url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-08%20until%3A2026-06-10&src=typed_query&f=live", "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "Logged-in Chrome/X search for @thsottiaux posts across the local-day coverage window returned six visible June 8 Asia/Shanghai candidate posts. None semantically announced a reset or recovery window." + "summary": "Logged-in Chrome/X search for @thsottiaux posts across the widened UTC coverage window returned four visible candidates. Two fell inside 2026-06-09 Asia/Shanghai, and neither semantically announced a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset window." }, { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 06:21 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T22:21:38Z)", - "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063748242681307611", - "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "@thsottiaux said Codex would select one person per day for 100 days to receive 10X usage limits for one month. This is usage-limit related, but it is a selective promotion, not a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset-window signal." - }, - { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 11:33 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T03:33:50Z)", - "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063826811373658213", - "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "@thsottiaux replied that users should build things when asked how to participate in the 10X usage-limit promotion. Immediate thread context included third-party limit complaints, but the source-account reply did not announce a reset or recovery." - }, - { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 14:14 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T06:14:33Z)", - "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063867254945767838", + "published_at_label": "2026-06-09 01:38 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T17:38:01Z)", + "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2064039257392709683", "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "@thsottiaux joked in a model-personality thread. It was unrelated to Codex rate limits, quotas, message caps, or reset windows." + "summary": "@thsottiaux replied in a Codex-or-Claude bug-solving thread by encouraging Codex use throughout the day. Immediate replies included user complaints about limits, but the source-account post did not announce reset or recovery behavior." }, { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:59 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:59:43Z)", - "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063772925644464276", + "published_at_label": "2026-06-09 01:35 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T17:35:20Z)", + "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2064038582529221017", "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "@thsottiaux replied agreement in a thread about ChatGPT's personal-assistant direction. It was product-direction discussion, not a rate-limit reset signal." + "summary": "@thsottiaux replied \"No\" to a question asking whether ChatGPT messages burn Codex limits. This was usage-accounting clarification, not a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset-window signal." }, { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:53 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:53:47Z)", - "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063771435194261915", - "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "@thsottiaux replied in a thread about loops and attached media. The reply was not about reset behavior, quotas, usage caps, or recovery windows." - }, - { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:52 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:52:05Z)", - "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063771005332697532", - "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "@thsottiaux replied to a coding-agent usage poll with an adoption comment. Third-party replies mentioned rate limits, but the source-account post did not announce a reset or cap recovery." - }, - { - "published_at_label": "2026-06-04 08:25 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-04T00:25:58Z)", - "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2062329981548802523", + "published_at_label": "2026-06-08 06:21 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-07T22:21:38Z)", + "url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063748242681307611", "relevance": "not_related", - "summary": "An older @thsottiaux post did announce that Codex usage limits had been reset across paid plans. It confirms the target semantic pattern, but it is outside the June 8 watch date." + "summary": "The profile's latest visible original post remained the 10X usage-limit promotion for selected Codex builders. It is usage-limit related, but it is outside the watch date and does not announce a general reset or recovery window." } ] }