Skip to content

Add Reasoning Core to community environments#781

Open
sileod wants to merge 1 commit into
huggingface:mainfrom
sileod:docs/add-reasoning-core-community-env
Open

Add Reasoning Core to community environments#781
sileod wants to merge 1 commit into
huggingface:mainfrom
sileod:docs/add-reasoning-core-community-env

Conversation

@sileod

@sileod sileod commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds the Reasoning Core environment to the community catalog.

@sileod sileod changed the title docs: add Reasoning Core community environment Add Reasoning Core to community environments Jun 8, 2026

@Darktex Darktex left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: This is an automated review by Claude Code, not a human review.


Verdict: Approve

Two-tier review of this docs-only change (docs/source/environments.md, +8/-0).

Tier 1 — Bugs / correctness / lint

No issues. The new Reasoning Core card is a faithful structural match for the existing community catalog cards:

  • Same card classes (border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow), title/description structure, and flex gap-2 mt-3 link row as the RLVE Gym entry directly above it.
  • Both a 📄 Docs and 🤗 HF link are provided, well-formed, and pointing at the same Space (reasoning-core/reasoning-core-openenv).
  • Correctly placed inside the existing md:grid md:grid-cols-3 container; HTML nesting is balanced.

Tier 2 — Alignment with OpenEnv principles

No concerns. This only adds an entry to the community catalog. No source changes, no API/agent-infrastructure boundary touched, no invariants affected. The description (formally verifiable symbolic reasoning tasks) is consistent with an external community environment.

Clean addition — thanks for contributing it.


Automated review by Claude Code | Learn more

@Darktex Darktex left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: This is an automated review by Claude Code, not a human review.


Tier 1 — Bugs & Lint

No issues. Docs-only, additive change. The new Reasoning Core card is well-formed HTML and structurally identical to the sibling community-environment card (RLVE Gym) immediately above it on main: same <div class="border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow"> wrapper and the same 📄 Docs + 🤗 HF button pattern, with the Docs link pointing at the Space's README.md (matching RLVE Gym's convention).

Tier 2 — Alignment

No concerns. Pure addition to the community catalog — touches no code, APIs, or invariants. No RFC needed.

Verdict: approve


Automated review by Claude Code | Learn more

@Darktex Darktex left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: This is an automated review by Claude Code, not a human review.


Review: Add Reasoning Core to community environments

Thanks for the contribution! Reviewed against the PR's base (main).

Tier 1 — mechanical: Clean. The new card is byte-for-byte consistent with the existing Community Environments cards on main (e.g. the RLVE Gym card directly above it): same outer border dark:border-gray-700 p-5 rounded-lg shadow wrapper, font-bold mb-2 title, text-sm description, and the flex gap-2 mt-3 button row with 📄 Docs + 🤗 HF links using the shared !no-underline ... link classes. HTML is well-formed and sits correctly inside the md:grid-cols-3 grid. Both links point at the reasoning-core/reasoning-core-openenv Space (README for Docs, Space root for HF), matching the established convention.

Tier 2 — alignment: No concerns. This is a docs-only addition to the community catalog and follows the existing external-HF-Space pattern (same as RLVE Gym). No bearing on any OpenEnv invariant.

LGTM. (Note: the PR is currently BLOCKED on required checks/branch protection, not on review.)


Automated review by Claude Code | Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants