| 1 |
GitHub Actions |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (dominant for GitHub repos) |
Free, unlimited |
2,000 free min/mo (Free plan), 3,000 (Pro), pay-as-you-go after |
✅ Self-hosted runners (free) |
🥇 Top pick — repo already on GitHub |
| 2 |
Azure DevOps Pipelines |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ (huge in .NET / enterprise) |
Free, unlimited (1 parallel job, 1,800 min/mo) |
1 free parallel job (1,800 min/mo); $40/mo per extra parallel job |
✅ Self-hosted agents (free) |
🥈 Excellent for .NET; deep Azure integration |
| 3 |
GitLab CI/CD |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
400 free CI min/mo (Free tier) on SaaS |
Free / Premium $29/user/mo / Ultimate $99/user/mo |
✅ Self-managed GitLab + runners (free CE) |
Good if you mirror to GitLab; great single-vendor DevOps |
| 4 |
Jenkins |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ (legacy/enterprise) |
Free |
Free |
✅ Self-host only |
Full control, infra-heavy; overkill unless on-prem required |
| 5 |
TeamCity (JetBrains) |
⭐⭐⭐ |
Free Professional tier (100 build configs, 3 agents) |
Enterprise: from ~$2,400/yr (3 agents) |
✅ Self-host; TeamCity Cloud SaaS from $45/mo |
Strong .NET support, great UI |
| 6 |
CircleCI |
⭐⭐⭐ |
Free tier: 6,000 build min/mo |
Performance from $15/mo; Scale custom |
❌ SaaS (self-hosted runners optional) |
Fast SaaS; less common for .NET shops |
| 7 |
Travis CI |
⭐⭐ (declining) |
Limited free tier for OSS |
From $69/mo |
❌ SaaS |
Was popular for OSS; mostly replaced by GH Actions |
| 8 |
Bitbucket Pipelines |
⭐⭐⭐ |
50 free build min/mo (Free plan) |
Standard $3/user/mo (2,500 min); Premium $6/user/mo (3,500 min) |
✅ Self-hosted runners |
Only relevant if you move to Bitbucket |
| 9 |
AWS CodePipeline / CodeBuild |
⭐⭐⭐ |
Pay-per-use (~$1/active pipeline/mo + build minutes) |
Same |
❌ Managed AWS |
Good only if deploying primarily to AWS |
| 10 |
Google Cloud Build |
⭐⭐ |
120 free build min/day |
Pay-per-use after free tier |
❌ Managed GCP |
Only if deploying to GCP |
| 11 |
Drone CI |
⭐⭐ |
OSS edition free |
Enterprise license required for >5k users |
✅ Self-host |
Lightweight, container-native |
| 12 |
Buildkite |
⭐⭐ |
30-day trial |
$15/user/mo (Pro); custom Enterprise |
✅ Hybrid (Buildkite controls, your agents) |
Hybrid model, great for scale |
| 13 |
Argo CD / Argo Workflows |
⭐⭐⭐ (Kubernetes GitOps) |
Free (OSS) |
Free |
✅ K8s-only |
Pair with another CI for GitOps CD on Kubernetes |
| 14 |
Tekton |
⭐⭐ (CNCF) |
Free (OSS) |
Free |
✅ K8s-only |
Cloud-native CI on K8s; steeper learning curve |
| 15 |
Spacelift / Harness / Octopus Deploy |
⭐⭐⭐ (commercial CD specialists) |
Limited free tiers |
Paid (Harness from $100/mo, Octopus from $360/yr) |
Hybrid |
Specialized release/deployment management |
CI/CD Options for EduTrack (.NET 10 + Angular + PostgreSQL)
Here's a comparison of mainstream CI/CD platforms suitable for your stack.
📊 Comparison table
🏆 Recommendation for EduTrack
Given your project context (GitHub-hosted, .NET 10 + Angular + PostgreSQL, MIT-licensed, single maintainer + community contributors):
actions/setup-dotnet,actions/setup-node,postgresservice container), works seamlessly with the Contributing + PR workflow you already document✅ What a typical GitHub Actions pipeline for EduTrack would do
dotnet testwith coverage,npm ci && npm run test && npm run buildfor Angular, lint, security scanmain— build Docker images, push to GHCR/Docker Hub, deploy to Azure/AWS/your serverYou already reference this direction in cicd-configuration.md and the "CI/CD Ready" badge in README.md.
Want me to outline a concrete GitHub Actions workflow file (build + test + Docker) tailored to your EduTrack + edutrack-ui layout?