|
| 1 | +# Expected failures for the carried-forward 2026-07-28 legs |
| 2 | +# (`--suite all --spec-version 2026-07-28` for both server and client). |
| 3 | +# |
| 4 | +# This baseline is separate from expected-failures.yml because entries are |
| 5 | +# keyed by scenario name only: a scenario that passes at its default version |
| 6 | +# in the 2025 legs but fails when forced to 2026-07-28 (or vice versa) cannot |
| 7 | +# be expressed in a shared file (the passing leg would flag the entry as |
| 8 | +# stale). Like expected-failures.yml, this single file covers both |
| 9 | +# directions: the client 2026 leg reads the `client:` section and the server |
| 10 | +# 2026 leg reads the `server:` section. Both burn down independently of the |
| 11 | +# 2025 legs. |
| 12 | +# |
| 13 | +# Baseline established against @modelcontextprotocol/conformance pinned in |
| 14 | +# .github/workflows/conformance.yml (CONFORMANCE_VERSION = 0.2.0-alpha.4). |
| 15 | +# New conformance releases are adopted by deliberately bumping that pin and |
| 16 | +# reconciling both this file and expected-failures.yml in the same change. |
| 17 | +# |
| 18 | +# Entries are grouped by what unblocks them. As each gap closes the |
| 19 | +# corresponding scenarios start passing and MUST be removed from this list |
| 20 | +# (the runner fails on stale entries), so the baseline burns down per |
| 21 | +# milestone. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +client: |
| 24 | + # --- No stateless client path on main yet --- |
| 25 | + # client.py drives the 2025 stateful lifecycle (initialize handshake + |
| 26 | + # session). The 2026-mode mock server is stateless, so the call sequence |
| 27 | + # never reaches the assertion. Unblocks when client.py's is_modern_protocol() |
| 28 | + # branch takes the per-request _meta path. |
| 29 | + - tools_call |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + # --- SEP-837 (application_type during DCR) --- |
| 32 | + # The sep-837-application-type-present check only fires on 2026-version |
| 33 | + # runs; the client omits application_type during Dynamic Client |
| 34 | + # Registration, so every auth scenario that reaches DCR fails it on this |
| 35 | + # leg (the same scenarios pass at their default version in the 2025 legs). |
| 36 | + - auth/metadata-default |
| 37 | + - auth/metadata-var1 |
| 38 | + - auth/metadata-var2 |
| 39 | + - auth/metadata-var3 |
| 40 | + - auth/scope-from-www-authenticate |
| 41 | + - auth/scope-from-scopes-supported |
| 42 | + - auth/scope-omitted-when-undefined |
| 43 | + - auth/token-endpoint-auth-basic |
| 44 | + - auth/token-endpoint-auth-post |
| 45 | + - auth/token-endpoint-auth-none |
| 46 | + - auth/offline-access-not-supported |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + # --- Auth scenarios cut short by the 2026 connection lifecycle --- |
| 49 | + # The auth fixture flow drives the 2025 stateful lifecycle; the 2026-mode |
| 50 | + # mock rejects the MCP POST before the scope-escalation behaviour these |
| 51 | + # scenarios measure, so no authorization requests are observed. Unblocks |
| 52 | + # when client.py's auth flow speaks the 2026 per-request lifecycle. |
| 53 | + - auth/scope-step-up |
| 54 | + - auth/scope-retry-limit |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + # --- Same gaps as the 2025 baseline (fail identically when forced to 2026-07-28) --- |
| 57 | + # SEP-2575 (request metadata / _meta envelope): client does not populate the |
| 58 | + # _meta envelope or the MCP-Protocol-Version header semantics yet. |
| 59 | + - request-metadata |
| 60 | + # SEP-2322 (multi-round-trip requests): client does not echo requestState / |
| 61 | + # handle IncompleteResult yet. |
| 62 | + - sep-2322-client-request-state |
| 63 | + # SEP-2243 (HTTP standardization): no fixture handler / client header support yet. |
| 64 | + - http-custom-headers |
| 65 | + - http-invalid-tool-headers |
| 66 | + # SEP-2106 (JSON Schema $ref handling): client still dereferences network $refs. |
| 67 | + - json-schema-ref-no-deref |
| 68 | + # SEP-2468 (authorization response iss parameter): not implemented in the client. |
| 69 | + - auth/iss-supported |
| 70 | + - auth/iss-not-advertised |
| 71 | + - auth/iss-supported-missing |
| 72 | + - auth/iss-wrong-issuer |
| 73 | + - auth/iss-unexpected |
| 74 | + - auth/iss-normalized |
| 75 | + - auth/metadata-issuer-mismatch |
| 76 | + # SEP-2352 (authorization server migration): client does not re-register when |
| 77 | + # PRM authorization_servers changes. |
| 78 | + - auth/authorization-server-migration |
| 79 | + # auth/enterprise-managed-authorization (SEP-990) is in the 2025 baseline but |
| 80 | + # NOT here: the harness skips it as inapplicable at --spec-version 2026-07-28 |
| 81 | + # (it is an extension scenario not carried into the 2026 wire), so it is |
| 82 | + # neither run nor evaluated on this leg. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +server: |
| 85 | + # --- Carried-forward 2025-era scenarios still failing on the 2026 wire --- |
| 86 | + # The stateless 2026 path now reaches handlers for plain request/response |
| 87 | + # scenarios; tools-call-with-progress still fails because the stateless |
| 88 | + # server has no channel for server→client progress notifications. |
| 89 | + - tools-call-with-progress |
| 90 | + # SEP-2106 (JSON Schema 2020-12 in tool inputSchema): the fixture tool's |
| 91 | + # schema has none of the 2020-12 keywords the scenario checks. The scenario |
| 92 | + # is in `--suite all` but not `--suite active`, so this is the only leg that |
| 93 | + # runs it; it fails identically at 2025-11-25 (not a 2026-path regression). |
| 94 | + - json-schema-2020-12 |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | + # --- Draft scenarios (same failures and reasons as the `--suite draft` leg) --- |
| 97 | + # SEP-2575 (stateless HTTP / _meta envelope): server has no stateless mode, |
| 98 | + # _meta-derived capabilities, error-code mappings, or server/discover yet. |
| 99 | + - server-stateless |
| 100 | + # SEP-2322 (multi-round-trip requests / IncompleteResult): not implemented. |
| 101 | + - input-required-result-basic-elicitation |
| 102 | + - input-required-result-basic-sampling |
| 103 | + - input-required-result-basic-list-roots |
| 104 | + - input-required-result-request-state |
| 105 | + - input-required-result-multiple-input-requests |
| 106 | + - input-required-result-multi-round |
| 107 | + - input-required-result-non-tool-request |
| 108 | + - input-required-result-result-type |
| 109 | + - input-required-result-tampered-state |
| 110 | + - input-required-result-capability-check |
| 111 | + - input-required-result-validate-input |
| 112 | + # SEP-2243 (HTTP header standardization): -32020 HeaderMismatch handling and |
| 113 | + # case-insensitive/whitespace-trimmed header validation not implemented. |
| 114 | + - http-header-validation |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + # --- WARNING-only entries --- |
| 117 | + # These scenarios emit no FAILURE checks, only SHOULD-level WARNINGs, but |
| 118 | + # the expected-failures evaluator counts WARNINGs as failures. Same entries |
| 119 | + # as the draft suite in expected-failures.yml. |
| 120 | + # SEP-2164: server returns -32600 (not -32602) and omits error.data.uri. |
| 121 | + - sep-2164-resource-not-found |
| 122 | + # SEP-2322 SHOULD-level behaviour (re-request missing inputResponses). |
| 123 | + - input-required-result-missing-input-response |
0 commit comments