You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wonder why Application Services are not available to assign a Config Context, while both Tags or Roles are.
One use case I stumble upon is to assign specific configuration (a Zabbix template to monitor Apache metrics).
I cannot use Role because it's single-valued, and we already use it for functional roles ("Application server" vs. "Infrastructure server"), and "Apache" is not a functional but a technical role. Moreover, the same server would have more roles: "MariaDB", "PHP", etc.).
Sure I could go away with Tags. But I feel Application Service is the correct way; if it were available in Config Context, of course.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I wonder why
Application Servicesare not available to assign aConfig Context, while bothTagsorRolesare.One use case I stumble upon is to assign specific configuration (a Zabbix template to monitor Apache metrics).
I cannot use
Rolebecause it's single-valued, and we already use it for functional roles ("Application server" vs. "Infrastructure server"), and "Apache" is not a functional but a technical role. Moreover, the same server would have more roles: "MariaDB", "PHP", etc.).Sure I could go away with
Tags. But I feelApplication Serviceis the correct way; if it were available inConfig Context, of course.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions