-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.9k
Description
What is the problem this feature will solve?
Right now, the test runner with --experimental-code-coverage doesn't seem to include an entry in the report for files that were not tested at all — i.e., that didn't get loaded during the test execution — even if those files were matched by a --test-coverage-include glob.
This can make the report very misleading, as the reported "all files" coverage percentage can easily go up, even when actual coverage has gone down (i.e.,. because a new file was introduced with no tests at all).
I know this has been raised at least twice before, but there didn't seem to be any issue for it on the issue tracker, so I wanted to raise it here.
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
There should be some way to have these untested files show up in the report, but report 0% coverage. The effect (although not necessarily the implementation) would be similar to istanbul's --all option.
I'm not wedded to a particular API, but one reasonable option might be to have a --test-coverage-include-all flag that makes sure that any file matched by --test-coverage-include shows up in the report.
What alternatives have you considered?
As mentioned here, it's possible to sort of simulate this effect by passing a glob to node --test that covers all the files in the project. However, every file then gets run as a test file, which is a lot of extra overhead, as these files don't actually have any tests.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status