Analyzing Code

::: tip Installation The robotcode analyze command comes from the optional analyze package. If it isn't installed yet, add it:

pip install robotcode[analyze]   # or: pip install robotcode[all]

:::

robotcode analyze code performs static analysis on a Robot Framework project: it parses the .robot and .resource files, resolves their imports, libraries, and variables, and reports diagnostics for problems such as unknown keywords, unresolved variables, wrong argument counts, duplicate or failing imports, and deprecated syntax. No tests are executed.

The analysis is performed by the same code that powers the RobotCode language server, so the diagnostics are identical to the ones shown in the editor (the VS Code extension, the IntelliJ plugin, or any other LSP client); analyze code applies that analysis to the whole project from the command line. Configuration and profile resolution work the same as for robotcode robot, so imports and variables resolve as they would at run time. The result is printed as a human-readable list or, for CI use, as a structured report (JSON, SARIF, GitHub annotations, or GitLab Code Quality).

Which diagnostics are reported, and at what severity, can be configured per project or inline in the source; this is shared with the language server and documented separately in Controlling Diagnostics with Modifiers.

Who this is for:

Developers who want a fast "is my project sound?" check before committing or running anything.
CI/CD pipelines that want to fail a build on broken keyword references or upload findings to a code-scanning dashboard.
Code review / security tooling — the SARIF output plugs straight into GitHub code scanning; the GitLab format into Merge Request Code Quality widgets.
AI-driven workflows — a coding agent gets a precise, machine-readable list of what's wrong instead of having to run the suite and parse a traceback.

This guide covers analyze code. The analyze group has one other subcommand, cache, for inspecting and clearing the on-disk analysis cache — covered briefly at the end.

For the exhaustive, auto-generated option list see the CLI reference.

Quick start

# Analyze the current project (default paths from the active profile)
robotcode analyze code

# Analyze a specific folder or file
robotcode analyze code tests/acceptance
robotcode analyze code tests/acceptance/login.robot

# Only look at certain files
robotcode analyze code --filter "**/*.resource"

# Also report unused keywords and variables
robotcode analyze code --collect-unused

# Treat a specific diagnostic as ignored / as an error
robotcode analyze code -mi MultipleKeywords
robotcode analyze code -me VariableNotFound

# Machine-readable output
robotcode analyze code --output-format json
robotcode analyze code --output-format sarif --output-file robotcode.sarif

If you don't pass any paths, analyze code analyzes the whole project — every .robot / .resource file under the project root, minus the configured exclude patterns. (This is unlike robotcode robot, which would run only the default paths/suites from your profile.)

How `analyze code` finds your project

analyze code reuses the full RobotCode configuration pipeline:

It locates the project root and the robot.toml / pyproject.toml files the same way every other robotcode command does.
It applies the active profile(s) (--profile) and the [tool.robotcode-analyze] settings.
It honours --variable, --variablefile and --pythonpath (mirroring the corresponding robot options) so that imports and variable resolution behave exactly as they would at run time.

This matters: a keyword that only resolves because of a --pythonpath entry or a variable file resolves during analysis too, instead of being wrongly reported as missing.

The project's imports and libraries are always resolved up front, across the whole project — that part can't be narrowed. The per-file diagnostics are then computed only for the files selected by paths / --filter, so a narrower selection does make a run faster.

What it checks

The diagnostics are exactly those the language server produces. Among the most common:

KeywordNotFound — a keyword call that resolves to nothing.
MultipleKeywords — an ambiguous keyword name matching several definitions.
VariableNotFound / VariableNotReplaced — references to variables that don't exist or can't be resolved statically.
import diagnostics — LibraryAlreadyImported, ResourceAlreadyImported, ImportContainsErrors, circular imports, …
deprecation warnings — DeprecatedReturnSetting, DeprecatedHeader, DeprecatedHyphenTag, …
model errors — empty tests/keywords, invalid headers, and other structural problems.

This is static analysis, so it isn't the last word: actually running the suite — or even discovering it with robotcode discover — can surface errors that analyze code doesn't. Building the real test suite runs additional, suite-wide checks (for example duplicate test case names), and a PreRunModifier may have changed the suite before it's executed — neither of which the per-file static analysis sees. A clean analyze code result is a strong signal, not a guarantee that a run will start without errors.

Unused keywords and variables

By default analyze code does not flag unused definitions. Unlike the per-file diagnostics, deciding whether a keyword or variable is unused needs the reference data of the whole project — not just the selected files — so it can't take the paths / --filter shortcut, and it adds an extra pass that is noticeably slower on projects with many keywords and variables. Enable it explicitly:

robotcode analyze code --collect-unused

This adds two diagnostics:

KeywordNotUsed — a keyword defined in the project that nothing references.
VariableNotUsed — a variable/argument that's never read. Names that are intentionally unused (${_}, ${_ignored}) are skipped.

They behave like any other diagnostic — you can remap or ignore them with the modifiers (e.g. -mh KeywordNotUsed) or # robotcode: comments.

You can also turn this on permanently in robot.toml:

[tool.robotcode-analyze.code]
collect_unused = true

Severities and diagnostic modifiers

Every diagnostic has one of four severities — Error, Warning, Information, Hint — and you can remap any diagnostic code to a different severity (or silence it entirely). On the command line:

Flag	Effect
`-mi`, `--modifiers-ignore CODE`	Ignore this diagnostic code entirely
`-me`, `--modifiers-error CODE`	Treat as Error
`-mw`, `--modifiers-warning CODE`	Treat as Warning
`-mI`, `--modifiers-information CODE`	Treat as Information
`-mh`, `--modifiers-hint CODE`	Treat as Hint

Each flag can be given multiple times. The same mapping is available — and usually better kept — in robot.toml:

[tool.robotcode-analyze.modifiers]
ignore = ["VariableNotFound"]
error = ["MultipleKeywords"]
hint = ["KeywordNotUsed"]

* is a wildcard that matches every code, so -mi "*" silences all diagnostics. Re-introducing specific codes at a chosen severity then gives you an allow-list:

# show only KeywordNotFound — reported as a warning
robotcode analyze code -mi "*" -mw KeywordNotFound

This is a remap (the kept codes take the severity you assign). If you instead want to keep a code at its original severity, use the --code filter.

Because the severity is configurable, the text and SARIF/GitHub/GitLab output always carries the effective severity, not a hard-coded one. For the full modifier system — including inline # robotcode: comments — see Controlling Diagnostics with Modifiers.

Reporting only some diagnostics

Two flags narrow the result to a subset. Unlike the modifiers above (which remap a code's severity), these filter: whatever you don't list is dropped from the output, the summary and the exit code alike — the severity of what remains is unchanged.

--severity — keep only the given severities. Values: error, warn/warning, info/information, hint.
--code — keep only the given diagnostic codes (e.g. KeywordNotFound); matching is case-insensitive.

Both are repeatable and comma-separated. When both are given they combine with AND — a diagnostic must match both.

robotcode analyze code --severity warning,hint               # only warnings and hints
robotcode analyze code --code KeywordNotFound                # only KeywordNotFound, with its real severity
robotcode analyze code --code KeywordNotUsed --severity hint  # only KeywordNotUsed that are hints

When neither is given, everything is reported.

Exit codes

analyze code exits with a bitwise combination of these values, so a single status tells you which severities were present:

Bit	Value	Meaning
—	`0`	SUCCESS — nothing reported
`1`	`ERRORS`	at least one error
`2`	`WARNINGS`	at least one warning
`4`	`INFOS`	at least one information
`8`	`HINTS`	at least one hint

For example, errors and warnings give 1 | 2 = 3.

To stop certain severities from affecting the exit code — e.g. so warnings don't fail the build — use an exit-code mask:

# Warnings/infos/hints no longer change the exit code; only errors do
robotcode analyze code --exit-code-mask warn,info,hint

# Same, but additive to the mask configured in robot.toml
robotcode analyze code --extend-exit-code-mask hint

Valid mask values: error, warn (alias warning), info (alias information), hint, all. In robot.toml:

[tool.robotcode-analyze.code]
exit_code_mask = ["warn", "info", "hint"]   # CI fails only on errors

Any non-zero exit means something was reported, which is what makes a CI step fail by default. To branch on a specific severity, test the corresponding bit — in bash:

robotcode analyze code
code=$?
(( code & 1 )) && echo "errors present"
(( code & 2 )) && echo "warnings present"

Output formats

The local --output-format flag selects how results are rendered. It overrides the global --format for this command:

Value	Output
`concise` (default)	Human-readable list, one finding per line, sorted by `(file, line, column)`
`json`	Compact structured result (`diagnostics` + `summary`)
`json-indent`	Same, pretty-printed
`sarif`	SARIF 2.1.0 log — for GitHub code scanning and other SARIF consumers
`github`	GitHub Actions workflow annotations (`::error file=…`)
`gitlab`	GitLab Code Quality report (JSON array)

--output-file FILE writes the report to a file instead of stdout (for the json, json-indent, sarif, github and gitlab formats) — handy for uploading a CI artifact. A missing target directory yields a clear error rather than a traceback.

robotcode analyze code --output-format sarif --output-file reports/robotcode.sarif

Text output (`concise`)

The default format prints one finding per line:

tests/login.robot:4:5: [ERROR] KeywordNotFound: No keyword with name 'Lgin User' found.
tests/login.robot:7:1: [WARNING] KeywordNotUsed: Keyword 'Helper' is not used.
Files: 12, Errors: 1, Warnings: 1, Infos: 0, Hints: 0 (in 0.42s)

Each line is path:line:column: [SEVERITY] Code: message; the severity tag is colored (red/yellow/blue/cyan).
Output is sorted by (file, line, column), so it's stable regardless of internal analysis order.
Workspace-level problems that aren't tied to a single file (e.g. a broken command-line variable file) are prefixed with .:.
Related locations are shown on indented -> lines.
The summary line is colored after the highest severity present.

By default RobotCode trims the Python traceback and PYTHONPATH listing that Robot Framework appends to import errors. Pass --show-tracebacks to keep the full message.

SARIF

--output-format sarif emits a SARIF 2.1.0 log — the format GitHub code scanning, Azure DevOps and the VS Code SARIF Viewer consume.

robotcode analyze code --output-format sarif --output-file robotcode.sarif

Paths are written relative to the project root, which is what GitHub code scanning expects (use --full-paths for absolute paths). Once uploaded, an alert stays stable as long as the finding does — an unrelated edit that merely shifts its line number won't create a duplicate.

GitHub Actions annotations

--output-format github emits workflow annotations. Printed in a GitHub Actions job, they appear inline on the affected lines in the PR diff and in the run summary.

robotcode analyze code --output-format github

Each diagnostic becomes one annotation line:

::error file=tests/login.robot,line=4,col=5,endColumn=14,title=KeywordNotFound::No keyword with name 'Lgin User' found.

GitLab Code Quality

--output-format gitlab emits a Code Quality report that GitLab renders in the Merge Request Code Quality widget.

robotcode analyze code --output-format gitlab --output-file gl-code-quality.json

Each diagnostic becomes one entry in the JSON array:

[
  {
    "description": "No keyword with name 'Lgin User' found.",
    "check_name": "KeywordNotFound",
    "fingerprint": "…",
    "severity": "major",
    "location": { "path": "tests/login.robot", "lines": { "begin": 4 } }
  }
]

CI recipes

GitHub: upload to code scanning

Produce a SARIF file and upload it so the findings appear under Security → Code scanning. The security-events: write permission is required for the upload, and continue-on-error lets the upload run even when analyze code exits non-zero because it found problems.

name: RobotCode Analyze
on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  analyze:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      security-events: write      # required for upload-sarif
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v6
        with:
          python-version: "3.x"
      # Set up the project with whatever package manager it uses (pip, uv,
      # poetry, pdm, hatch, ...); analysis just needs robotcode[analyze] available.
      - run: pip install robotcode[analyze]
      - run: robotcode analyze code --output-format sarif --output-file robotcode.sarif
        continue-on-error: true
      - uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v4
        with:
          sarif_file: robotcode.sarif

GitHub: inline PR annotations

Print the github format directly — the diagnostics show up as inline annotations on the run and in the PR diff. No upload and no extra permissions needed.

name: RobotCode Analyze
on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  analyze:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v6
        with:
          python-version: "3.x"
      # Set up the project with whatever package manager it uses (pip, uv,
      # poetry, pdm, hatch, ...); analysis just needs robotcode[analyze] available.
      - run: pip install robotcode[analyze]
      - run: robotcode analyze code --output-format github

GitLab: Code Quality artifact

Write the GitLab report and expose it as a codequality artifact; GitLab renders it in the Merge Request Code Quality widget.

robotcode-analyze:
  image: python:3
  script:
    # set up the project with whatever package manager it uses (pip shown here)
    - pip install robotcode[analyze]
    - robotcode analyze code --output-format gitlab --output-file gl-code-quality.json
  artifacts:
    reports:
      codequality: gl-code-quality.json

Fail the build on errors only

# Exit non-zero only for errors; warnings/infos/hints are reported but ignored
robotcode analyze code --exit-code-mask warn,info,hint

Get just the counts

robotcode analyze code --output-format json | jq '.summary'

Managing the analysis cache

To speed up repeat analysis, RobotCode caches resolved library/variable imports (and, with --cache-namespaces, analyzed namespaces) on disk. The analyze cache subcommands let you inspect and clear it:

robotcode analyze cache info     # where the cache lives and how big it is
robotcode analyze cache list     # what's cached
robotcode analyze cache path     # print the cache directory
robotcode analyze cache clear    # remove it (e.g. after changing ignored-libraries)
robotcode analyze cache prune    # drop stale entries only

Clearing the cache is the usual fix after changing cache-affecting settings such as ignore-arguments-for-library.

Configuration via `robot.toml`

Everything controllable on the command line (and more) lives under [tool.robotcode-analyze]:

[tool.robotcode-analyze]
exclude-patterns = ["**/generated/**"]
global-library-search-order = ["MyPreferredLibrary"]
load-library-timeout = 30

[tool.robotcode-analyze.code]
collect_unused = true
exit_code_mask = ["warn", "info", "hint"]

[tool.robotcode-analyze.modifiers]
ignore = ["VariableNotFound"]
error = ["MultipleKeywords"]

[tool.robotcode-analyze.cache]
ignored-libraries = ["MyDynamicLibrary"]

See the robot.toml configuration reference for the complete list of settings.

JSON reference

--output-format json (or json-indent) emits a single object with two keys, using the same LSP Diagnostic shape as robotcode discover and robotcode results:

{
  "diagnostics": {
    "tests/login.robot": [
      {
        "range": { "start": { "line": 3, "character": 4 },
                   "end":   { "line": 3, "character": 13 } },
        "message": "No keyword with name 'Lgin User' found.",
        "severity": 1,
        "code": "KeywordNotFound",
        "source": "robotcode"
      }
    ]
  },
  "summary": { "files": 12, "errors": 1, "warnings": 0, "infos": 0, "hints": 0 }
}

Field notes:

Keys in diagnostics are source paths (project-relative POSIX, or absolute with --full-paths). Workspace-level diagnostics key on ..
severity follows the LSP enum: 1 = Error, 2 = Warning, 3 = Information, 4 = Hint.
Positions are 0-based (LSP convention), unlike SARIF/GitHub which are 1-based.
The JSON always carries the full diagnostic message — --show-tracebacks does not apply.
summary is always present, even for a clean run (all counts 0), so consumers get a stable schema.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Analyzing Code

Quick start

How `analyze code` finds your project

What it checks

Unused keywords and variables

Severities and diagnostic modifiers

Reporting only some diagnostics

Exit codes

Output formats

Text output (`concise`)

SARIF

GitHub Actions annotations

GitLab Code Quality

CI recipes

GitHub: upload to code scanning

GitHub: inline PR annotations

GitLab: Code Quality artifact

Fail the build on errors only

Get just the counts

Managing the analysis cache

Configuration via `robot.toml`

JSON reference

Uh oh!

FilesExpand file tree

analyzing-code.md

Latest commit

History

analyzing-code.md

File metadata and controls

Analyzing Code

Quick start

How analyze code finds your project

What it checks

Unused keywords and variables

Severities and diagnostic modifiers

Reporting only some diagnostics

Exit codes

Output formats

Text output (concise)

SARIF

GitHub Actions annotations

GitLab Code Quality

CI recipes

GitHub: upload to code scanning

GitHub: inline PR annotations

GitLab: Code Quality artifact

Fail the build on errors only

Get just the counts

Managing the analysis cache

Configuration via robot.toml

JSON reference

How `analyze code` finds your project

Text output (`concise`)

Configuration via `robot.toml`