✨🧑‍💻 - Bugbot autofix

[efraespada]

Is there an existing issue or feature request for this?

• I have searched the existing issues and feature requests.

What area does this improvement affect?

New Feature

What actions does this improvement affect?

No response

Description of the idea or improvement

This improvement aims to address several minor issues in the current Bugbot, while also introducing a new feature: the ability to reply or send messages directly from issues or pull requests where the Bugbot is asked to fix detected vulnerabilities.

In both issues and pull requests, the user should be able to simply say something like “fix it” or “fix them”. When this request is made in a general way (for example, “fix it” within an issue), OpenCode must interpret which vulnerability or vulnerabilities are still open and need to be addressed.

In the case of pull requests, if the user replies within the same thread that was opened for a specific vulnerability, the Bugbot should fix the exact issue that was detected and discussed in that thread. If, instead, the user adds a new comment in the pull request mentioning the Bugbot, it must interpret which vulnerability or vulnerabilities are being requested to be fixed.

The user may also provide more explicit instructions, such as “fix vulnerability X” or “fix all vulnerabilities you can find”.

In all cases, when the Bugbot receives a request to fix one or more issues, it must analyze the full context, resolve the detected vulnerabilities or potential problems, and execute a series of tasks to ensure everything is correct. This may include running build commands, tests, linters, or any other checks that are available and specified by the user.

Once all checks pass, OpenCode can confirm that the vulnerability has been fixed. If the fix is successful, the same GitHub Action, after OpenCode completes its work, must commit the local changes generated during this OpenCode workflow.

Current limitations or challenges

Detect local changes on the current workflow (where the GitHub Action is executed) and commit those changes.

Expected impact

Speed up the resolution of vulnerabilities.

Alternatives considered

None

Version of copilot

master

Additional context or comments

Good luck! 🤞

[vypbot]

✨ Feature Actions

1. The issue was assigned to @efraespada (creator).
2. The issue's title was updated from Bugbot autofix to ✨🧑‍💻 - Bugbot autofix.
3. The issue was linked to vypdev and moved to the column Todo.
4. Priority set to P2 in vypdev.
5. The branch develop was used to create feature/296-bugbot-autofix.
6. Moved issue to In Progress in vypdev.

Reminder

1. Take a coffee break while you work ☕.
2. Check out the branch:

git fetch -v && git checkout feature/296-bugbot-autofix

3. Commit the needed changes with this prefix:

feature-296-bugbot-autofix

4. Open a Pull Request from feature/296-bugbot-autofix to develop. New PR

🚀 Happy coding!

[efraespada]

@vypbot, what do you think? Based on the Fibonacci sequence, which estimation do you think this ticket should have?

[vypbot]

Based on the scope described—handling multiple scenarios (issues and PRs), interpreting natural language requests, analyzing context to identify vulnerabilities, executing fixes with build/test verification, and committing changes via GitHub Actions—I would estimate this as 8 story points on the Fibonacci scale. It's a substantial feature with several moving parts but well-defined requirements.

[efraespada]

Okay @vypbot thanks!

[efraespada]

@vypbot how would you start implementing everything?

@vypbot como empezarías a implementar todo?