Just curious.
MCP started from Anthropic and donated (transferred) ownership to Agentic AI Foundation, a project under Linux Foundation operates. It looks that the MCP trademark is hold by Linux Foundation, not the W3C.
So, is that okay for both to call the proposal "WebMCP"? Just curious. And is it a good name? as it's not technically an "official" MCP API for browsers but rather a compatibility layer (IIUC).
Just curious.
MCP started from Anthropic and donated (transferred) ownership to Agentic AI Foundation, a project under Linux Foundation operates. It looks that the MCP trademark is hold by Linux Foundation, not the W3C.
So, is that okay for both to call the proposal "WebMCP"? Just curious. And is it a good name? as it's not technically an "official" MCP API for browsers but rather a compatibility layer (IIUC).