Skip to content

chore: 146 - Log validation receipt creation#257

Merged
Exohayvan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ai/roadmap-step-1-146-20260716-064255
Jul 16, 2026
Merged

chore: 146 - Log validation receipt creation#257
Exohayvan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ai/roadmap-step-1-146-20260716-064255

Conversation

@Exohayvan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Roadmap step

phase-1/step-146: Step 146 - Log validation receipt creation

Objective

Complete the selected roadmap step using only the programmatically selected step details.

Selected step

# Step 146 - Log validation receipt creation

## Source Checklist Item
- [ ] Log validation receipt creation.

## Goal
Record every validation receipt creation event in a local audit log so a runnable prototype can prove when validation happened, which node created the receipt, what manifest or work artifact was validated, and how lineage and contribution attribution were preserved. The log must support honest replay/debugging without implying production security, rewards, or decentralization.

## Implementation Checklist
- [ ] Add a local audit log event for validation receipt creation only.
- [ ] Include timestamp, event type, receipt ID, creator node ID, validated manifest ID or path, validation result, and validation command or validator name.
- [ ] Include lineage references needed to trace the receipt back to the submitted work item, manifest, and prior receipt when present.
- [ ] Include contribution attribution fields already available at receipt creation time, without inventing missing identities.
- [ ] Write audit entries append-only in the prototype’s existing local data/log location.
- [ ] Ensure audit logging failure fails the receipt creation flow or clearly marks the receipt as not fully persisted.
- [ ] Avoid adding dashboards, networking, rewards, tokenomics, or later-phase trust claims.

## Required Tests Or Verification
- [ ] Create a validation receipt locally and confirm exactly one audit entry is appended.
- [ ] Verify the audit entry contains creator node ID, manifest reference, validation result, lineage reference, and contribution attribution.
- [ ] Verify failed or invalid validation attempts do not create misleading successful receipt logs.
- [ ] Verify repeated receipt creation appends new entries without overwriting earlier audit history.

## Risks
- [ ] Audit logs may drift from receipt contents if fields are duplicated inconsistently.
- [ ] Missing creator node ID or manifest references can break lineage.
- [ ] Logging success before durable receipt creation can create false evidence.

## Done When
- [ ] Every validation receipt creation produces a local, append-only audit log entry with enough metadata to trace validation, lineage, and attribution.

Changes

b45b49d chore: complete phase-1 step-146
 docs/local-audit-event-schema.md         |   6 +-
 src/aethermesh_core/local_audit_event.py |  56 +++++++++++++++
 src/aethermesh_core/runtime_service.py   |  77 ++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/test_local_audit_event.py          |   2 +-
 tests/test_runtime_service_api_cli.py    | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Validation

  • PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/full_test.py --mode fast --base origin/main --keep-going

Safety notes

  • Roadmap selection was performed by the Python loop, not by the AI agent.
  • No force push used.
  • No hard reset used.
  • Local automation paths are intentionally omitted.

@Exohayvan Exohayvan added area:runtime-config Area: generated triage label for runtime config. priority:P3 Priority P3: normal planned work. risk:high Risk: changes critical working behavior or release/runtime paths. system:runtime System: local node runtime/service lifecycle. type:maintenance Type: maintenance, cleanup, refactor, or dependency work. labels Jul 16, 2026
@Exohayvan
Exohayvan merged commit 184f884 into main Jul 16, 2026
23 checks passed
@Exohayvan
Exohayvan deleted the ai/roadmap-step-1-146-20260716-064255 branch July 16, 2026 11:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:runtime-config Area: generated triage label for runtime config. priority:P3 Priority P3: normal planned work. risk:high Risk: changes critical working behavior or release/runtime paths. system:runtime System: local node runtime/service lifecycle. type:maintenance Type: maintenance, cleanup, refactor, or dependency work.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant