[Automated][azure-resource-manager] Update ARM documentation: fix deprecated APIs, doc comments, rule titles, and broken links#4353
Conversation
- private-links-ref.tsp: Fix 'Properties of he private' -> 'Properties of the private' - nsp-operations.tsp: Fix @dev 'GET' -> 'Perform an action on' for Action/ActionAsync (POST ops) - arm.foundations.tsp: Remove ghost @template RequestBody tag not in op signature - private-endpoints.tsp: Fix '{name PrivateEndpointConnection}' -> '{name} PrivateEndpointConnection' - extension/operations.tsp: Fix truncated 'being rea' -> 'being read' Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…in ARM resource-type guide - Replace deprecated envelope property spreads (ResourceSku → ResourceSkuProperty, EntityTag → EntityTagProperty, ResourcePlan → ResourcePlanProperty, ResourceKind → ResourceKindProperty, ManagedBy → ManagedByProperty) - Replace deprecated ManagedIdentity spreads (ManagedServiceIdentity → ManagedServiceIdentityProperty, ManagedSystemAssignedIdentity → ManagedSystemAssignedIdentityProperty) - Replace manual name definitions (@segment/@key/@visibility/@path/name) with ...ResourceNameParameter<ModelName> across all code examples - Update decorator explanation bullets to describe ResourceNameParameter - Fix broken sample links (DynaTrace, tenant, singleton, OperationTemplates) - Fix typos: enevelope→envelope, SUpport→Support, defintion→definition - Fix copy-paste error: 'Tenant resources' → 'Subscription-based resources' in the Subscription-based Resource section Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…ate reference docs - Fix rule doc frontmatter titles to match registered rule names (arm- prefix) - Fix no-response-body.md title (was no-empty-model) - Fix unsupported-type.md title and namespace - Update step03/step05 to use ResourceNameParameter - Fix add-common-types.md link to correct repository - Regenerate reference docs (picked up TSP doc comment fixes) - Format all changed files Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
All changed packages have been documented.
Show changes
|
commit: |
…Name in docs Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/Azure/typespec-azure/sessions/d1295f52-9d33-4fe2-9d05-522e64206687 Co-authored-by: tadelesh <1726438+tadelesh@users.noreply.github.com>
Done in 36d5207. Applied the explicit |
|
You can try these changes here
|
…iption text with code examples Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/Azure/typespec-azure/sessions/f07275e3-c768-4ee7-bc81-2d703f197f8d Co-authored-by: tadelesh <1726438+tadelesh@users.noreply.github.com>
Done in 39a0674. All cases reviewed: removed redundant explicit |
|
@copilot Format the changes. |
…ementResource example Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/Azure/typespec-azure/sessions/f289bb1a-020f-4798-82a4-01fb5813d67e Co-authored-by: tadelesh <1726438+tadelesh@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot Merge main with resolving the conflict and resolve all current comments. |
…le arm- prefixes Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/Azure/typespec-azure/sessions/1ec75ac6-d511-4561-b1ea-f24c6853eb3c Co-authored-by: tadelesh <1726438+tadelesh@users.noreply.github.com>
Done in 34e3b15. Main was already merged in 496c823 (no conflicts). Addressed all of @markcowl's review comments: renamed example models to drop the |
|
@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request |
…entation-da9333c50271e2a1 # Conflicts: # website/src/content/docs/docs/libraries/azure-resource-manager/rules/delete-operation-response-codes.md # website/src/content/docs/docs/libraries/azure-resource-manager/rules/post-operation-response-codes.md # website/src/content/docs/docs/libraries/azure-resource-manager/rules/put-operation-response-codes.md # website/src/content/docs/docs/libraries/azure-resource-manager/rules/resource-name-pattern.md # website/src/content/docs/docs/libraries/azure-resource-manager/rules/unsupported-type.md Co-authored-by: tadelesh <1726438+tadelesh@users.noreply.github.com>
Done in b4ee06c. Merged |
|
@markcowl Could you review again? |
Resolve: #4351