Repository navigation
Standardize student workflows and add a layered DCB teaching example - #12
Merged
Merged
Conversation
allamaprabhuani
deleted the
codex/standard-simulation-workflow-20261008
branch
October 12, 2026 08:26
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Verification
Scientific scope
The DCB material regions are bulk AT2 fracture materials, not an independent cohesive or interphase-debonding law. Retained results show branching and different crack advance under a toughness contrast, not completed inclusion bypass or penetration. They are qualitative teaching evidence, not experimental validation or a mesh-independence claim. The historical generating source identity was not recorded and is explicitly marked unattested; no new full DCB rerun is claimed. Independent numerical and newcomer reviews informed the input-safety repairs and evidence wording.