Merged
Conversation
44a7656 to
77e5fc4
Compare
Collaborator
Author
Contributor
Yes. I think a new data name in |
vaitkus
reviewed
Jul 8, 2025
vaitkus
reviewed
Jul 8, 2025
jamesrhester
approved these changes
Jul 9, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
from #124
Instrument examples are split between PD_INSTR and PD_INSTR_DETECTOR.
I think the category descriptions need to be updated to point our that the former is source to specimen, and the latter is specimen to detector(s).