fix some titles in inspector and "Add to Canvas" for wickobj#111
Open
BaronAWC wants to merge 3 commits intodevelopmentfrom
Open
fix some titles in inspector and "Add to Canvas" for wickobj#111BaronAWC wants to merge 3 commits intodevelopmentfrom
BaronAWC wants to merge 3 commits intodevelopmentfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Font assets and wickobjs used to show as a "Multi-Asset" in the inspector, and while you could press "Add to Canvas" on a clip in the asset library, you could not do so in the inspector like an image. Both of these are fixed here.
I used the title "WickObject Asset" instead of "Clip Asset" only because I don't know how to distinguish between clip assets and button assets. Clips and buttons are distinguished when not in wickobj form so it's a little weird to classify button objects as clip objects??? Maybe I'm thinking too hard on this but it's fine.
Tested in browser and on mobile.