Skip to content

fix: Preserve reporting dependency compatibility across compilers - #13

Merged
maximkrouk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/dev229-reporting-compat
Sep 5, 2026
Merged

maximkrouk merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/dev229-reporting-compat

Conversation

@maximkrouk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Casification unconditionally requests swift-issue-reporting, but Swift 6.2 selects Point-Free compatibility manifests that use xctest-dynamic-overlay. Consumers combining these packages fail resolution because both identities declare IssueReporting targets.

Match the identity to the compiler in both manifests: Swift 6.4+ uses the current package; earlier compilers use the overlay. The overlay lower bound is 1.5.0, whose manifest supports Swift 5.9, while Swift 6.x can resolve newer compatible 1.x releases. Public products and all library/test source remain unchanged.

Validation: all 25 local tests in 7 suites pass on Swift 6.4. The existing five-platform Xcode 26.2 CI matrix verifies the compatibility graph. Exact consumer failure is recorded in https://github.com/CaptureContext/package-resources-cli/actions/runs/33997720831 . This is a follow-up prerequisite to CaptureContext/swift-snippets#10 and will be consumed by a merged-revision pin, without publishing a release tag.

@maximkrouk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review Please review compiler-specific package identities and minimum versions in both manifests. Swift6.2 Point-Free manifests use xctest-dynamic-overlay, Swift6.4 uses swift-issue-reporting; the unchanged Casification sources only need the shared IssueReporting APIs. Overlay1.5.0 retains the declared Swift5.9 manifest support, newer compilers resolve later1.x. All25localtests pass; existing five-platform Xcode26.2 CI runs unchanged.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-05T23:16:38.903764Z b27fd5f Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: b27fd5f593

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@maximkrouk
maximkrouk merged commit 32a8de5 into main Sep 5, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant