ci: Adding CODEOWNERS

[sunib]

Description

Brief description of the changes in this PR.

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• Performance improvement
• Test coverage improvement

Testing

• Unit tests pass locally
• Integration tests pass locally
• Manual testing completed (if applicable)
• New tests added for new functionality

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Related Issues

Closes #(issue number)

Screenshots (if applicable)

Add screenshots to help explain your changes.

Additional Notes

Any additional information that reviewers should know.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added a repository-wide ownership rule so changes across the project now default to the designated owner for review.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f4933db5-4f6f-4967-9530-20ea144d9385

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8ce917 and 6f5e9a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CODEOWNERS

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new CODEOWNERS file at the repository root that assigns @sunib as the default owner for all files using the wildcard pattern.

Changes

Repository ownership configuration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add default CODEOWNERS rule CODEOWNERS	Introduces a CODEOWNERS file specifying @sunib as owner for all paths (*).

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description keeps the template headings but leaves all sections as placeholders, so it doesn't explain the change.	Replace template text with a filled-out summary, selected change type, testing status, checklist items, and any related issues or notes.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and clearly reflects the CODEOWNERS addition.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codeowners

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!