-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New Forestry Routine Features #282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
crollinson
wants to merge
14
commits into
EDmodel:master
Choose a base branch
from
crollinson:Forestry_Testing
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
271c185
Add notes from Marcos
crollinson 3882558
Initial commits for harvest option based on area and mindbh
crollinson 2c5f0ea
resolve merge conflicts
crollinson 6b68f44
remove finding target biomass for ianth_disturb=2
crollinson 1f0c0c8
typo correct in harvest probability assignment
crollinson 326e631
some more places to add ianth = 2
crollinson 13116d1
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/EDmodel/ED2 into Forestry…
crollinson 9a39105
Update Forestry: names changes; add above/below harvest
crollinson 495d96e
Fix typos that prevent compilation
crollinson 064f392
fix above/below bug
crollinson 0ed9540
Bug fix to compile
crollinson 4ca39eb
Quick forestry fixes
crollinson 9dcb293
Forestry fix: need to allocate potential harvest area
crollinson a04d89c
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/EDmodel/ED2 into Forestry…
crollinson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@crollinson I am going through the code merging but this part is a bit confusing to me, and I think this approach here may be saving too many trees. In my original implementation, harvprob is used to define the disturbance rate. In general, survivorship should reflect the survivorship in the immediate vicinity of disturbed area (in this case, where the tree was logged), which is why survivorship was set to zero. For the time being I kept your approach for the area-based option (ianth_disturb=2), but I am not sure how to reconcile this part with the original survivorship definition, especially with understory thinning.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only idea I had so far is to create a new dist_type for thinned canopy. The upside is that it would be consistent with the ED idea that disturbances change the microenvironment (in the case of thinning, more in the water part than in the light). The one potential downside is that we would have more dist_types (tree felling, skid trails and roads, and artificially thinned canopy).
I don't see a problem to add a new dist_type if it is justified, but before I go ahead, I'd like to throw the idea and see what people think, or if anyone has other ideas.