🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix XSS vulnerability by removing unsafe CSP directives#414
🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix XSS vulnerability by removing unsafe CSP directives#414EffortlessSteven wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Removed `unsafe-inline` and `unsafe-eval` from the production Content Security Policy (CSP) in both `http-middleware` and `app-http` crates. These directives were present in the default configuration, exposing the application to potential XSS attacks. The development configuration remains unchanged to support local development tools.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 25 minutes and 55 seconds.Comment |
Test Results283 tests 245 ✅ 10m 51s ⏱️ Results for commit c6b8999. |
1 participant
🚨 Severity: HIGH
💡 Vulnerability: The default (production) Content Security Policy (CSP) allowed
'unsafe-inline'and'unsafe-eval'directives inscript-srcandstyle-src.🎯 Impact: This weakens the CSP, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary inline scripts, styles, and use
eval(), which is a common vector for Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.🔧 Fix: Removed
'unsafe-inline'and'unsafe-eval'from thedefault()(production) configuration ofSecurityHeadersConfigin bothhttp-middlewareandapp-httpcrates. The development configuration remains more permissive to support local tooling (like HMR).✅ Verification: Ran
cargo test -p http-middleware -p app-httpto verify all tests pass and no functionality is broken. Tests explicitly cover the presence and absence of these directives in different environments.PR created automatically by Jules for task 17847939555896943578 started by @EffortlessSteven