Skip to content

fix(SimulationChecker): release GEOS SimulationChecker matching OpenGeode-Geosciences API - #208

Merged
BenPinet merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
fix/release-simulation-checker
Nov 6, 2026
Merged

BenPinet merged 1 commit into
nextfrom
fix/release-simulation-checker

Conversation

@BotellaA

@BotellaA BotellaA commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Nightly schedules of OpenGeode-Inspector, OpenGeode-Inspector_Geosciences, Geode-Implicit, Geode-SLB and Geode-Fracsima fail to link:

libOpenGeode-GeosciencesIO_model.so: undefined reference to `geode::validate_physical_problem[abi:cxx11](geode::PhysicalProblem const&)'
... validate_physical_problem_regions / validate_physical_problem_properties / physical_problem_warnings

OpenGeode-Geosciences 9.14.0-rc.1 (#216 feat/simulation-report) removed these functions. next here was already adapted (#207), but the Deploy ecosystem run (Versions 42059929963) aborted on an HTTP 500 when dispatching this repo's deploy.yml. So 5.19.0-rc.1 was never published and downstream still pulls 5.18.0-rc.1.

This empty fix commit triggers a new release that is ABI-consistent with OpenGeode-Geosciences 9.14.0-rc.1.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…eode-Geosciences API

OpenGeode-Geosciences 9.14.0-rc.1 removed validate_physical_problem*
and physical_problem_warnings, but the ecosystem deploy aborted before
publishing OpenGeode-GeosciencesIO, leaving 5.18.0-rc.1 which still
references them and breaks downstream links.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@BotellaA
BotellaA requested a review from panquez November 6, 2026 06:28
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Cpp-Linter Report ✔️

No problems need attention.


✨ Powered by cpp-linter -- ⭐ Star • ❤️ Sponsor • 💬 Feedback

@BenPinet
BenPinet merged commit efd3d2c into next Nov 6, 2026
25 checks passed
@BenPinet
BenPinet deleted the fix/release-simulation-checker branch November 6, 2026 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants