fix(test): settings-purchasing-grace.test.ts failure on feat (closes #514)

[cristim]

Summary

• Failing assertion (line 305 of settings-purchasing-grace.test.ts before the fix): expect(toastArg.message).toBe('AWS grace period: Must be a whole number between 0 and 30') -- the test expected the old per-provider toast wording.
• Root cause: PR ux(settings): grace-period validation message only names the first failing provider when multiple are bad #478 changed saveGlobalSettings to aggregate all failing grace-period providers into a single toast (Grace period must be a whole number between 0 and 30 days (AWS).). Commit 1c92887be (PR fix(ux/settings): inline range validation on numeric settings inputs #471 follow-up) added the inline-validation tests but carried the stale per-provider assertion from the pre-ux(settings): grace-period validation message only names the first failing provider when multiple are bad #478 design.
• Fix shape (test-side): PR test(frontend/settings): align grace-toast expectation with #478 aggregation #548 (508704a79) already updated the assertions to match the aggregated format. The fix is test-side: the production code (saveGlobalSettings) is correct and emits the aggregated message as designed by ux(settings): grace-period validation message only names the first failing provider when multiple are bad #478.
• This PR adds an 8-line history comment to the test file header so future readers understand why the expected message format is aggregated and where the mismatch was introduced/resolved.

Test counts

17 passed, 0 failed (npx jest src/__tests__/settings-purchasing-grace.test.ts). npx tsc --noEmit clean.

Closes #514

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@cristim, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 6 minutes and 12 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8fbaf90d-5c7e-437c-86bc-2eeaf760a30e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4956d66 and 5e8a2e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• frontend/src/__tests__/settings-purchasing-grace.test.ts

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/514-from-bucket-c

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[cristim]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[cristim]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

Rate Limit Exceeded

@cristim have exceeded the limit for the number of chat messages per hour. Please wait 54 minutes and 21 seconds before sending another message.

[cristim]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[cristim]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[cristim]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[cristim]

Closing as redundant. The actual test fix (changing assertions to the aggregated toast format) landed in PR #548 and is already merged. This PR was comment-only documentation explaining the history of issue #514; the context lives in PR #548's history and the original issue.