Skip to content

build: release audited Canvas trim through same-schema host path - #239

Merged
lyyzka merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
release/canvas-host-20261020
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

lyyzka merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
release/canvas-host-20261020

Conversation

@lyyzka

@lyyzka lyyzka commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The Debian/glibc server image shipped an unused 30,315,608-byte musl Canvas binding. This integrates PR237's reviewed removal with a guarded same-schema Komodo host-file release path. Runtime remains the formally published 3.5.8; native schema13/protocol11/product48 and all48 migration checksums are unchanged.

Candidate 9a5cfda82ad105d666bf0452df1d615daf6c6a28 passed exact CI 39444057773 and immutable image publication 39443966923. Independent image reconciliation passed22layers,521source paths,474runtime and379PDF files; the sole removed entry is the unused musl binary, with18retained Canvas entries unchanged. Compressed image bytes decreased205,959,232→192,937,300 (−13,021,932;−6.3226%); expanded tar decreased30,314,496bytes.

Production accepted at2026-10-20T15:45:47.705Z:16/16 checks plus independent recomputation and11crosschecks. Both hosts run the exact audited image index sha256:9c6753001d1561db46c45a00e6cbdfa2fceae304454f7da3c84c4e981ffb1b08; all4Web/Worker services are healthy with0restarts/noOOM. All36native preparation/release updates have matching terminal Complete/success receipts. Public API4/4 and HTML/JS/CSS3/3 passed. Both hosts' native Canvas/real PDF probes passed before oldWorkers stopped.359sampled readyz requests had0failures; explicit Worker drain/recovery timestamps are retained and sampling is not continuous availability proof.

Application Compose source is f70f6d46b39d65ad3c9aad2284db9c85a0cf3600, with immutable image9a5 and cache-only --no-deps --pull never; Core/environment/security/volumes remain unchanged. Contributor history is preserved. The legacy ordinary rollout remains blocked; persistent ResourceSync/ordinary-dispatch integration is not claimed complete.

Full production acceptance, receipts and independent reviews.

#229 remains open for controlled cold/warm build and peak-disk measurements and broader deletion scope. Authenticated production smoke, full fault-isolation matrix and long-duration soak are not claimed; fixed3.5.3 soak was untouched. #216 content maintenance is a separately tracked operation, not implied by schema acceptance.

@lyyzka
lyyzka marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2026 15:56
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-20T16:00:30.552743Z 9a5cfda Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@lyyzka
lyyzka merged commit 9a5cfda into main Oct 20, 2026
16 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9a5cfda82a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

COPY server/package.json server/package-lock.json server/.npmrc ./
COPY package.json /tmp/qualified-package.json
COPY scripts/prune-pdfjs-server-runtime.mjs /tmp/prune-pdfjs-server-runtime.mjs
COPY scripts/prune-glibc-canvas-runtime.mjs /tmp/prune-glibc-canvas-runtime.mjs

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Track the Canvas prune script as a server image input

When a later commit changes only this newly copied script, the path filters in .github/workflows/ci.yml match neither server_source nor server_docker, so computeScope schedules no server image build or publication and the pruning logic can diverge from the deployed image without its owning check. Add scripts/prune-glibc-canvas-runtime.mjs to the server image/source filter and cover that scope mapping in the CI-scope tests.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L27-L27

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants