Run rusqlite's SQLite3MC tests on the vendored amalgamation in CI

[LucaCappelletti94]

sqlite3mc-src exists to feed the bundled-sqlite3mc feature of libsqlite3-sys, yet CI never built that consumer on the bytes under review. A SQLite3MC release that drops or renames a function the committed rusqlite bindings declare would pass every check here and break only when someone built rusqlite.

The new rusqlite job fetches the feat/sqlite3mc-src branch of LucaCappelletti94/rusqlite at one pinned commit, points its sqlite3mc-src dependency at this checkout and runs rusqlite's tests with the feature sets that branch runs, including a buildtime_bindgen pass that regenerates the bindings from the shipped header. The branch requires one exact sqlite3mc-src release, and Cargo silently drops a patch whose version misses it, so the job rewrites that requirement to the checkout's version and ends by checking that the build output names this checkout's sqlite3mc directory. Without both, a release-bot PR would test the old crates.io bytes and pass.

A weekly rusqlite pin workflow goes red when the fork branch moves past the pinned commit or when a released rusqlite gains bundled-sqlite3mc, so the pin moves to a released coordinate as soon as one exists.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: LucaCappelletti94/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: b9266749-0e3d-447a-bd69-39c46ef36798

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2e8b059) to head (663e653).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #10   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            3         3           
  Branches         3         3           
=========================================
  Hits             3         3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud