fix: incorrect subdivision#356
Conversation
1. update function call with `Points` structure. 2. remove deprecated methods.
|
@dtoshniwal There is a problem here that will require some thought: there is no obvious way to subdivide a |
Indeed, I wanted to bring this up earlier as well. I think the DiscreteGeometry structure needs additional fields (FEM space, coefficients) that are used to construct the evaluable function. This way, one could use the additional fields to construct a subdivided representation. Otherwise, as you say, there is no other way to do this. I think these additional fields are OK because the only use case (at least the one I have in mind) is FEM geometries. |
|
@dtoshniwal I marked this as ready because regardless of the discrete geometry issue the changes here are still bug fixes that should be merged. |
|
@dccabanas One question: why are we restricting two-scale operators for B-splines/canonical spaces such that the child space is obtained by |
Can you point out where in the code this is happening? I don't recall. |
Here for instance: |
It seems to have be introduced in this commit b67dfee. But I'm not sure why the limitation is there. Do you think it can be generalised? |
No description provided.