existing-app-change: ask Stage 0 in plain words - #133
Merged
Merged
Conversation
What do you want to work on, do you have input documents, what else does it touch — replaces slice / blast radius in the mode's user-facing text: the skill, intake Q4–Q5, the Stage 0 gate message, the pipeline walk, the routing row and CAC-1's mode table. Migration keeps its own vocabulary. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VJgWP5vEoAsNsJYqCDMGNw
MendixMau
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 23, 2026 17:30
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed and why
Users of the change an existing app mode found "which slice, what is its blast radius" confusing, and the intake asked for a scope boundary before anyone had seen the app. Stage 0b in this mode now asks three plain questions, after the map:
sources/; "none, the app plus my description" is a fine answerplus the standing question: of what we touch, what must stay exactly as it is (default for an existing app: nothing beyond the ask changes).
Where the wording moved:
skills/existing-app-change.md— ground rule 2, the "map the app first" section, the Stage 0b paragraph, the stage table (P row now says proposed answers are confirmed by the user, never filled in by the agent), coverage and deliverables. The literalmxcli brain capture --sliceflag is kept, labelled as mxcli's own term.bin/lib/intake-template.sh— Q4 and Q5 headings and bodies (numbers unchanged; Q9 untouched).bin/gate-check.sh— the Stage 0 "waiting on the change" message (the grepped substring is unchanged).docs/pipeline-walks.html— change-app diagram and table only.skills/app-analysis.md,skills/conversion-runbook.md,CONVERSION-RUNBOOK.md,README.mdintro,bin/lib/skill-routing.tsvrow + re-render (ROUTING.md, two agent templates).skills/checkpoints/checkpoint-scope.md— CAC-1's mode table gains the missing Change an existing app row.CHANGELOG.mdline.Migration keeps "slice" — there it means ordering a large source.
triage.mdkeeps its filename (scripts and tests key on it); renaming it is roadmap 1.4.Field evidence
Wording change only, no instrument logic. Prompted by the 2026-09-22 field run of this mode and the workshop prep on 2026-09-23, where "slice" and "triage" were the two words the intended audience could not map to anything.
Guards run locally:
render-routing.sh --check,check-scripts.sh,check-portability.sh, leak guard — all clean. Test fixtures not run;test-bug03-gates.shT12's grep target (waiting on the change) verified present by inspection.Checklist
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01VJgWP5vEoAsNsJYqCDMGNw
Generated by Claude Code