Merged
Conversation
* Add Agent Executor doc * Move advanced down * Address comments * Add style * Add agent executor description to handoff * Address comments * Apply suggest
Add article about agent safety best practices
* document workflow IResettableExecutor * Update python zone pivots. * Removed unnecessary comment.
* Add workflow advanced execution mode doc * Address PR review comments on execution modes doc - Add 'Step execution' row to the comparison table - Add IMPORTANT note about crossRunShareable requirement for concurrent runs - Clarify Python execution model similarity to Lockstep mode Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…considerations (#933) * Update agent framework docs for GA: middleware, providers, orchestrations, and agent executor Source issue: microsoft/agent-framework#4872 * Address review feedback for #933: review comment fixes * Address review feedback for #933: review comment fixes --------- Co-authored-by: MAF Dashboard Bot <maf-dashboard-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Merge main to live
…n-existent AgentRunOptions.RunMiddleware The docs described AgentRunOptions.RunMiddleware for run-level middleware, but this property does not exist. In .NET, run-level middleware uses the same .AsBuilder().Use(...).Build() decorator pattern applied inline before calling RunAsync/RunStreamingAsync. - Replace AgentRunOptions.RunMiddleware with correct builder pattern - Add streaming middleware examples (runStreamingFunc) to both sections - Add TIP callout explaining the pattern Fixes microsoft/agent-framework#3951 Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix C# run-level middleware docs to use builder pattern instead of no…
* Update doc to clarify human in the loop patterns for agents orchestrations * Update python code snippet for parity with C#
Merge main to live
Contributor
Author
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 9091169: ✅ Validation status: passedFor more details, please refer to the build report. |
westey-m
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Learn Build Service tried pushing to main, but failed due to branch protection rule in this branch. We create this pull request for manual merge. Please merge this pull request to complete this sync.
If you want to make push successfully without creating such pull requests in future, please follow working with branch protection rule to update your branch protection rule.