Skip to content

fix(verify): discover authorized Docker tests before blocking - #11

Merged
nsticco merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/verify-discover-docker-tests
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

nsticco merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/verify-discover-docker-tests

Conversation

@nsticco

@nsticco nsticco commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

Require the portable verifier to discover repository-documented Docker test paths and attempt authorized container checks before declaring a local toolchain blocker. Retain terminal evidence or concrete admission diagnostics, and reuse a stable request ID when retrying identical generic jobs.

This is the canonical bundle update consumed by MoonLadderStudios/MoonMind#4203. Repository-specific test commands and images remain in consumer guidance; managed execution preserves existing authorization boundaries.

Testing

  • Bundle validation passed: python3 tools/validate_bundle.py.

  • All 17 tests passed in an isolated Python environment: python -m pytest.

  • MoonMind skill/loader and container CLI coverage: 70 tests passed. A managed-session reliability replay is being added in the consumer PR.

  • Tested locally with uv run specify --help

  • Ran existing tests with uv sync && uv run pytest

  • Tested with a sample project (if applicable)

AI Disclosure

  • I did not use AI assistance for this contribution
  • I did use AI assistance (describe below)

Codex authored and validated the instruction change and prepared this PR.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-10T07:15:07.290855Z 08704b7 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@nsticco
nsticco merged commit 1e2f630 into main Sep 10, 2026
2 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 08704b7958

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +338 to +342
In MoonMind, inspect the exposed container tool contract and CLI help, and use
the repository's managed test entrypoint or
`moonmind container run --spec <job.json> --request-id <stable-phase-id>`
with a job specification derived from documented test commands and approved
image sources. The API-owned Docker Backend supplies the daemon and toolchain;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Move MoonMind execution details out of the portable skill

When this bundle is projected into consumers other than MoonMind, it now carries a MoonMind-only CLI command and API-owned backend contract, coupling the canonical verifier to one consumer and requiring bundle changes whenever that consumer API evolves. Keep the portable verifier limited to discovering an authorized container entrypoint, and place the concrete moonmind container run contract in MoonMind's AGENTS.md or consumer documentation.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L21-L23

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant