forked from NYPL-Simplified/Simplified-iOS
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Feature/clever support #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Neckk
wants to merge
20
commits into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
feature/cleverSupport
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dbc6ba6
login from settings and books listing
Neckk 3b4676f
note to self
Neckk 7193fc1
Clever alpha version
Neckk b13aac1
refactored keychain storage
Neckk 048d9ef
Merge branch 'develop' into feature/cleverSupport
Neckk 4118525
swift front end validator + refactore logic lying behind account auth…
Neckk ea2ecd0
Open ebooks beta
Neckk 86cc543
beta 2
Neckk 9b0f1a3
added support for patron info from oauth login
Neckk aab2ad2
uncommited comment
Neckk 069f33a
removed cleverloginviewcontroller
Neckk d3d4ba6
removed unnecessary Codable code
Neckk 5f49fe4
cleaned unnecessary swift function
Neckk da7c2da
renaming keychain functions
Neckk 369e357
changed thread used to perform catalog loading in accounts manager
Neckk 33a0074
split account removing logic
Neckk 6ceee81
renamed network executor function name
Neckk 2f3ca82
convenience refactor to keychain storage and documentation comments
Neckk 85e1f66
accounts manager comment
Neckk 7426d23
remove legacy keychain values
Neckk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you keep the classname the same between Swift and Objc? Easy to rename the Swift one if needed. This way the codebase would be much easier to browse IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AccountDetailsAuthentication because Authentication struct is nested inside AccountDetails struct. I wasn't able to access this struct otherwise in objc, but I might take a second look into this.
struct AccountDetails {
struct Authentication {
}
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's possible to use nested types in Objective-C. And I'm afraid of name collision in case there is another
Authenticationtype in future. I'd leave it as it currently is.