Repository navigation
Record the 0.0.1 candidate re-review: BLOCK on two High findings - #320
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot review overview
🟡 Changes recommended
The structural-block status and candidate disposition contain unresolved inconsistencies.
Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.
Review effort: Lite
Findings: 1
Open (2)
What changed in this PR
Documents the 0.0.1 candidate re-review and records a BLOCK disposition for two unresolved High findings.
Changes:
- Adds candidate-specific packed-byte evidence and F4/F5 findings.
- Updates release disposition, sequence, and revision history.
- Updates structural-block status documentation.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
docs/workflows/first-release-security-review.md |
Records the candidate re-review and blocking findings. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
The first passing aggregate for the frozen candidate 96804bc lifts the structural block. Re-reviewing that candidate's packed bytes shows it predates #277 (discovery-v2 downgrade latch) and #285 (protected fetch error cause redaction), both High, plus the F1 fix #294. They are fixed on main but absent from the bytes that would ship, so the disposition stays BLOCK and a new candidate is required. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
BunsDev
force-pushed
the
docs/sdk40-candidate-rereview
branch
from
September 25, 2026 09:48
da0cc3b to
eedd05d
Compare
9 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #40. Records the fresh ship/block disposition in
docs/workflows/first-release-security-review.md.Disposition: BLOCK.
aggregateRecord: null) is lifted by the live-verified three-platform aggregate in Commit the first accepted SDK #38 aggregate for the 0.0.1 candidate #319.96804bc4(2026-09-14) is an ancestor of themainrevision the earlier review examined (aec069089). Its packed bytes predate:observedV2/assertProtectedAuthorityare absent from the candidate source and from the packedcave-clientdist/.pairing.ts:929attaches the fetch exception ascauseunconditionally.mainonly.private: true, and have no install or prepare lifecycle scripts.maincontains all three fixes. The findings concern the frozen candidate's bytes, not current source.Sequence to SHIP:
main.Docs only, no code change.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code