Update to use ORB instead of RB

[Kyle-Ye]

No description provided.

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR continues the RenderBox (RB) → OpenRenderBox (ORB) migration by renaming key types and API surfaces to ORB terminology and updating dependencies.

Changes:

• Bumps pinned revisions for OpenAttributeGraph and OpenRenderBox in Package.resolved
• Renames accelerated drawing types from RBDrawingView/Layer to ORBDrawingView/Layer and updates platform display-list view creation
• Renames RenderBoxView/RenderBoxLayer to OpenRenderBoxView/OpenRenderBoxLayer
• Updates PlatformDrawableOptions and related call sites from rbLayer to orbLayer
• Renames RenderBox-facing shims and payloads: RBDisplayListContents → ORBDisplayListContents, plus interpolator/content case names
• Updates rasterization configuration from rbColorMode → orbColorMode
• Updates path storage naming from rbPath → orbPath across Swift and C/ObjC overlays

Technical Notes: The changes are largely mechanical renames intended to align the codebase with ORB naming while keeping accelerated rendering paths routed through ORBDevice/ORBLayer when available.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 2 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[augmentcode]

ORBDisplayListContents is a protocol (see RenderBoxShims.swift), so storing it as var orbList: ORBDisplayListContents may run into Swift 6 existential rules (and is inconsistent with drawing(any ORBDisplayListContents, ...)). Consider making the existential explicit here to avoid build breaks/warnings under Swift 6 language mode.

Severity: medium

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

[augmentcode]

The doc comment above orbColorMode still refers to RBColorMode, which seems outdated after the RB→ORB rename. Consider updating the documentation to the current ORB naming so callers know which enum/raw values are expected.

Severity: low

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 52 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 27.49%. Comparing base (afdfcda) to head (962d693).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
Sources/OpenSwiftUICore/Shape/Path.swift	0.00%	16 Missing ⚠️
...ces/OpenSwiftUICore/View/Image/GraphicsImage.swift	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
...OpenSwiftUI/Render/DisplayList/RenderBoxView.swift	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
.../OpenSwiftUICore/Render/RasterizationOptions.swift	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
...SwiftUI/Render/DisplayList/AppKitDisplayList.swift	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...DisplayList/CAHostingLayerPlatformDefinition.swift	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...UI/Render/DisplayList/DisplayListViewDrawing.swift	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...rces/OpenSwiftUICore/Render/PlatformDrawable.swift	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
Sources/OpenSwiftUICore/Shape/PathData.swift	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...enSwiftUICore/View/Image/SymbolRenderingMode.swift	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 3 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #820   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.48%   27.49%           
=======================================
  Files         661      661           
  Lines       42444    42444           
=======================================
+ Hits        11667    11671    +4     
+ Misses      30777    30773    -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.