Skip to content

chore: regenerate tend workflows with latest version#5760

Merged
max-sixty merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/tend-workflow-skill-names
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

chore: regenerate tend workflows with latest version#5760
max-sixty merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/tend-workflow-skill-names

Conversation

@prql-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Regenerated all tend workflow files with uvx tend init using the latest tend version
  • Fixes skill name mismatches (/tend:tend-review/tend-ci-runner:review, etc.) that caused the review workflow to fail with Unknown skill: tend:tend-review (run)
  • Updated .config/tend.toml to match new config schema (setup array-of-tables, workflows.weekly rename)
  • Added new tend-notifications.yaml workflow

Closes the issue raised in #5759.

Changes

File Change
.config/tend.toml Updated config format ([[setup]], workflows.weekly)
tend-review.yaml Fixed /tend:tend-review/tend-ci-runner:review, simplified (review-response handling moved to mention workflow)
tend-ci-fix.yaml Fixed /tend:tend-ci-fix/tend-ci-runner:ci-fix
tend-triage.yaml Fixed /tend:tend-triage/tend-ci-runner:triage
tend-nightly.yaml Fixed /tend:tend-nightly/tend-ci-runner:nightly
tend-mention.yaml Added pull_request_review event handling, queue delay computation, dedup check
tend-notifications.yaml New workflow for polling GitHub notifications

Test plan

  • CI passes on this PR
  • Review workflow triggers correctly on the next PR

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Fixes skill name mismatches (`/tend:tend-*` → `/tend-ci-runner:*`) that
caused review and other workflows to fail silently.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@max-sixty max-sixty enabled auto-merge (squash) March 31, 2026 21:12
@max-sixty max-sixty merged commit 33847fd into main Mar 31, 2026
40 checks passed
@max-sixty max-sixty deleted the fix/tend-workflow-skill-names branch March 31, 2026 21:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants