Bot test: Adds line to Readme for testing the CLA bot

[brob]

Ignore this PR

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated contribution guidelines to clarify the requirement for signing the Contributor License Agreement when submitting pull requests.

[github-actions]

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
_{Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9c3c6c7b-9d06-4faf-89cf-c74b705da2b9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f860452 and d9db7b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README.md file has been updated with an additional italicized statement in the "Contributing" section notifying contributors that opening a pull request against the repository requires signing the Contributor License Agreement.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation README.md	Added italicized CLA requirement notice to the Contributing section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• chore: First steps toward CLA signing #2830: Adds CLA document and signing workflow alongside corresponding README updates requiring CLA signatures.
• CLA Action branch change #2847: Modifies README to include CLA callout and adjusts the CLA GitHub Action workflow.
• docs: update readme community section #1678: Expands the Contributing section content in README with community and contribution guidelines.

Suggested reviewers

• ucatbas
• omer-topal
• mooreds

Poem

🐰 A notice hops into the Contributing page,
"Sign the CLA," it gently does engage,
Contributing now requires this legal dance,
Before your pull request gets its chance! 📜✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding a line to README for CLA bot testing purposes.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch test-for-cla

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[brob]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.61%. Comparing base (f860452) to head (d9db7b1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2848      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.56%   82.61%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          74       74              
  Lines        8297     8297              
==========================================
+ Hits         6850     6854       +4     
+ Misses        911      908       -3     
+ Partials      536      535       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.