-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
perf(codegen): inline captureless some loop; codegen-time module-const literal fold (ECS round 4, +5.2%) #8933
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
| - **codegen:** `arr.some(capturelessArrow)` runs as an inline loop with a direct call of the arrow's body (rooted receiver re-read per element, forwarded heads through the new `js_array_live_head`, holes skipped, `true`/`false` decided inline); `js_array_some_captureless` stays the fallback for receivers the loop does not admit. | ||
| - **driver:** module-level `const` literals (`export const MAX = 1023`) fold into their reads after the whole transform phase and before codegen, so one-line predicates comparing against them earn their typed clones without changing any cross-module inlining decision. `codehz/ecs` "5k entities: 3 commands each + sync": +3.7% and +1.5% (15/15 paired runs each). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🔎 Supported by static analysis
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 349
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 50369
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 50371
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 32124
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 50369
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 2120
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 50369
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: PerryTS/perry
Length of output: 22731
Gate the element argument on
param_count >= 1.When
param_count == 0, this inline path passeselemto a closure whose LLVM signature contains onlyi64 this_closure. LLVM can reject the non-variadic call because it has one extra argument. Add the guard before pushingelem.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents