Skip to content

Comments

Adding to Open Protocol docs#125

Merged
Rickedb merged 3 commits intoRickedb:masterfrom
lily-maxfield:master
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

Adding to Open Protocol docs#125
Rickedb merged 3 commits intoRickedb:masterfrom
lily-maxfield:master

Conversation

@lily-maxfield
Copy link
Contributor

Added:

Archive (old versions of Open Protocol specification):

  • OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.8.0.pdf
  • OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.16.0.pdf

AtlasCopco (Open Protocol implementations specific to Atlas Copco hardware):

  • OpenProtocolSpecification_MTF6000_2025.pdf
  • OpenProtocolSpecification_PF6000_Appendix_2.8.pdf

Open Protocol Specification:

  • OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.17.0.pdf

Removed:

  • OpenProtocol_Specification.pdf (re-added as "OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.17.0.pdf")

Uploaded:

Archive (old versions of Open Protocol specification):
OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.8.0.pdf
OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.16.0.pdf

AtlasCopco (Open Protocol implementations specific to Atlas Copco hardware):
OpenProtocolSpecification_MTF6000_2025.pdf
OpenProtocolSpecification_PF6000_Appendix_2.8.pdf

OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.17.0.pdf

Removed:
OpenProtocol_Specification.pdf (re-added as "OpenProtocolSpecification_Release_2.17.0.pdf")
@ekdahl
Copy link
Contributor

ekdahl commented Feb 18, 2026

Maybe also update to a more recent release?

@lily-maxfield
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ekdahl

Maybe also update to a more recent release?

Perfect, thanks! Will add this shortly 😄

At @ekdahl request, I have added a slightly newer version of the Open Protocol specification.

Co-Authored-By: Fredrik Ekdahl <2682230+ekdahl@users.noreply.github.com>
@Rickedb
Copy link
Owner

Rickedb commented Feb 18, 2026

Is keeping archives helpful somehow?

Since there is the revision history section at every new version showing the diffs, I believe we can keep only the latest at the repo.

@lily-maxfield
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is keeping archives helpful somehow?

Unsure! Probably not.
My original concern was seeing that Rev 2.8.0's file size was over double that of Rev 2.16.0 - probably some change of images, but I did not analyse all ~300 pages to see any changes not captured by the revision history 😉.

I will remove this "Archive" sections, and recommit.

Thanks.

At @Rickedb suggestion, I have removed the old doc revs.
@Rickedb Rickedb merged commit 458e558 into Rickedb:master Feb 19, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants