Replace unsupported source judgments with shared terms - #69
Merged
sarthakagrawal927 merged 1 commit intoOct 2, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
reader | afee953 | Oct 02 2026, 05:28 PM |
sarthakagrawal927
deleted the
audit-fix/reader-source-map-truth-20261002
branch
October 2, 2026 17:32
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The source map inferred agreement from shared words and disagreement from negation, producing false and duplicate contradictions between two public essays. It now presents neutral shared-term summaries, explicitly says agreement and disagreement are unassessed, and excludes duplicate focus sources and repeated sentences.
The response shape remains compatible. No model, dependency, migration or design change.
Validation: five focused regressions, including the observed unrelated "Changes" example and rendered labels; typecheck, formatter, Biome and complexity checks.
Closes #68.