Agent-mode apply reports already_patched / applied: 0 when it actually patched an unpatched pnpm peer-variant copy (the store-copy pass's writes are never reported) #756

[agent] Found by the scheduled pnpm bug-hunt routine (ledger #303).

Summary

apply_package_patch re-runs the patch over every pnpm peer-variant copy of the package (find_store_peer_variant_copies, for example .pnpm/react-dom@18.2.0_react@18.2.0 and …_react@18.3.1). The copies' results are folded in for success/error only, and the event is classified from the primary copy's per-file records. When the primary is already patched and a twin is not, apply writes the twin, but the run reports that package as skipped / already_patched ("All files already match afterHash"). The JSON summary says applied: 0, and the human summary says 0 of 1 targeted patch applied, 1 already patched.

So the output says the run changed nothing when it actually fixed a vulnerable copy on disk. The same order-dependence decides whether the human Patched packages: block shows via blob at all. If the unpatched copy happens to be the first one visited, the run correctly reports applied: 1.

Impact

This is a reporting bug only: the bytes end up correct. But it breaks automation that keys on --json (summary.applied, events[].action), for example CI that treats applied > 0 after a postinstall as drift (node_modules was reset or a new peer variant appeared) and alerts or invalidates caches. In that case the drift is silently swallowed. It also contradicts CLI_CONTRACT's meaning of already_patched (every file already matched afterHash before the run).

Repro (Linux, pnpm 12.8.1, main 045d7ec)

mkdir -p ws/a ws/b && cd ws
echo '{"name":"root","version":"1.0.0","private":true}' > package.json
printf 'packages:\n  - a\n  - b\n' > pnpm-workspace.yaml
echo '{"name":"a","version":"1.0.0","dependencies":{"react":"18.2.0","react-dom":"18.2.0"}}' > a/package.json
echo '{"name":"b","version":"1.0.0","dependencies":{"react":"18.3.1","react-dom":"18.2.0"}}' > b/package.json
pnpm install            # -> .pnpm/react-dom@18.2.0_react@18.2.0 and .pnpm/react-dom@18.2.0_react@18.3.1
socket-patch scan --mode agent --yes      # a react-dom@18.2.0 patch (mock API); both copies patched
# simulate a re-created twin: put upstream bytes back into ONLY the react@18.3.1 copy
X=node_modules/.pnpm/react-dom@18.2.0_react@18.3.1/node_modules/react-dom/index.js
# (replace $X with its upstream content as a new file)
socket-patch apply --offline --json
#  summary: {"applied": 0, "skipped": 4, ...}; every event: skipped / already_patched
head -c 19 "$X"          # now patched: apply DID write it

Results for the three starting states (human output):

Each row reproduced at least twice. Four lines appear for two copies because each workspace-member link is also visited (#633). That's a separate bug.

Expected vs actual

• Expected: a run that patched files on disk reports the package as applied (with the files it wrote, or at least summary.applied: 1). already_patched is reserved for "nothing needed doing".
• Actual: the classification follows only the primary copy's file records, so the twin's patch is invisible.

Versions

Not a regression. Other pnpm versions and OSes aren't tested; the code path is version-independent. vlt ~peer copies go through the same fold, by code reading.

Suspect code

• crates/socket-patch-core/src/patch/apply.rs:742-753 (apply_package_patch): copies are applied, then fold_copy_result (:765) keeps only success/error. The doc comment says "The primary's per-file records are what the returned ApplyResult carries".
• crates/socket-patch-cli/src/commands/apply.rs:727 (result_to_event) and :1493 (tally_results) then classify from files_verified / files_patched of the primary only.

Probe runs: none (Linux reproduction only).