Skip to content

Update jdx/mise-action action to v5.2.1 - #164

Merged
vdiez merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/jdx-mise-action-5.x
Oct 26, 2026
Merged

vdiez merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/jdx-mise-action-5.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Pending
jdx/mise-action action patch v5.2.0 → v5.2.1 v5.2.3 (+1)

Release Notes

jdx/mise-action

v5.2.1: : Require the signed packslip for mise 2026.9.3 and later

Compare Source

The action now refuses to install mise 2026.9.3 or later if the release's signed packslip is missing. This closes a gap where verification could be downgraded to the weaker checksum check.

Fixed
  • A missing packslip no longer weakens the check on recent mise releases. v5.2.0 started checking the mise binary against the release's signed packslip.sigstore.json. If that file wasn't found, though, the action quietly fell back to the minisign-signed SHASUMS256 checksums. Anyone who could hide the file could force the weaker check. Every mise release from 2026.9.3 on includes a packslip, so for those versions a missing bundle now stops the install with an error like this:
    mise v2026.10.11 must ship a signed packslip, but https://github.com/jdx/mise/releases/download/v2026.10.11/packslip.sigstore.json was not found
    
    Releases before 2026.9.3 don't include a packslip, so they're still checked against the signed checksums. A version string that isn't three dot-separated numbers also requires a packslip. If you set the sha256 input, it still takes precedence over both checks. A packslip that fails verification still never falls back to the checksums. (#​695 by @​jdx)

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.0...v5.2.1


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone CET)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Never, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod

hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Renovate Jira issue ID: SONARJAVA-7231

@gitar-bot

gitar-bot Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Code Review ✅ Approved

🟡 Medium risk · Updating the pinned mise action changes CI installation verification; requiring a missing signed packslip could stop workflows from setting up mise.

Bumps the jdx/mise-action GitHub Action from v5.2.0 to v5.2.1, which refuses to install mise 2026.9.3 and later when the signed packslip.sigstore.json is missing instead of falling back to the weaker checksum check. No issues found.

Verification Rules 3/3 met

Functional validation No results

Rules 3 passed

✅ Approved GitHub Actions runners
✅ Internal artifact registries
✅ Repository license compliance

Auto-approval Not enabled

Set up

For more verification details, comment gitar display:verbose.

Options

Auto-apply is off → Gitar will not commit updates to this branch.
Display: compact → Showing compact verification results.

Comment with these commands to change the behavior for this request:

Auto-apply Compact
gitar auto-apply:on         
gitar display:verbose         

Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar

@sonarqube-next

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@vdiez vdiez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approved: Renovate dependency update.

@vdiez
vdiez merged commit 0ff7644 into master Oct 26, 2026
12 checks passed
@vdiez
vdiez deleted the renovate/jdx-mise-action-5.x branch October 26, 2026 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant