New SiNAPS probes #36
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
samuelgarcia
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2025
Member
|
Ciao Raffaele. |
Author
|
Bonjour, I've changed the "contact_ids" section to strings for all the probes. Should be good to go now. |
Member
|
grazie |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added 3 new SiNAPS probes and updated the pre-existing one to follow the formatting found in the new probe files.
They are very similar to the Plexon ones, but have a slightly adjusted contour and use the probeType name found in the metadata generated by the SiNAPS research acquisition software. I followed the same approach of relying on contact_ids instead of device_channel_indices since the probes are already pre-wired. The wiring is performed in the new version of the sinapsrecordingextractors.py extractor by running probe.set_device_channel_indices(probe.contact_ids)
Let me know if this approach is ok, if not I can make any needed adjustments.