Updated Contributing guidelines#288
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 14 minutes and 41 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughCONTRIBUTING.md has been comprehensively rewritten to replace basic contribution guidance with structured sections covering development setup (Python 3.12+, uv, pre-commit), testing infrastructure, code quality tools, pull request workflows, conventional commits, and code style guidelines. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
46061b5 to
50d4b5f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@CONTRIBUTING.md`:
- Around line 26-43: The "Setting Up Your Development Environment" section
contains markdownlint MD022/MD031 spacing violations around headings and fenced
code blocks; fix it by ensuring there is a blank line above and below the "###
Setting Up Your Development Environment" heading and every fenced code block
(the three bash blocks containing "git clone...", "uv sync --all-extras --dev",
and "uv run pre-commit install") so that each heading and triple-backtick code
fence is separated by a blank line from surrounding text; update those locations
accordingly to satisfy MD022/MD031.
- Line 107: Replace the incorrect noun "advice" with the verb "advise" in the
sentence that reads "We advice following the [Conventional Commits]..." so it
becomes "We advise following the [Conventional
Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) style." This fixes the
grammatical error in the CONTRIBUTING.md content string.
- Line 103: Update the "Open a Pull Request" guidance that currently instructs
contributors to target the `main` branch: change the text to instruct opening
PRs against the `unstable` branch (or explain when to use `main` vs `unstable`),
and ensure the sentence referencing `main` is replaced with `unstable` and any
related automation notes are adjusted accordingly in the "Open a Pull Request"
section (the line containing "Open a Pull Request: Submit your PR against the
`main` branch").
- Around line 50-52: Add a short explicit note under the "Solvers" section
stating that NEOS is currently unsupported; mention that while HiGHS (highspy)
is the supported solver, NEOS-related config paths are still present but will
raise NotImplementedError if used. Place a single-sentence clarification
directly below the existing HiGHS sentence (referencing "Solvers", "HiGHS",
"NEOS", and "NotImplementedError") so contributors won’t be confused by the
exposed NEOS config.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 0083aad4-e690-4809-a2b4-5b1b64eb802f
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md
50d4b5f to
d45a736
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit