OTF-4251: Code changes to ingore removed partitions during latest sch… - #14
Merged
Conversation
jb185048
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2025
Collaborator
|
@av255050 Please include mention of apache#4563 in the files changed. So that when we upgrade to a newer version with that fix, we can adapt changes from main. Thanks |
rg185064
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2025
Collaborator
Author
Done |
av255050
merged commit Aug 6, 2025
f38c341
into
feature/teradata-apache-iceberg-1.9.0
42 of 43 checks passed
jb185048
deleted the
bug/OTF-4251-ignore-removed-partitions-during-latest-schema-validation
branch
August 13, 2025 19:16
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…ema validation
Please look at 4th issue for problem and solution description: https://teradata-pe.atlassian.net/browse/OTF-4251?focusedCommentId=6107111
When we upgrade to a newer version, we can adapt changes from corresponding version if exists instead of this PR. If not, continue with this changes. Please refer to Github Iceberg issue link: apache#4563