Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 1 file
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="README_SOURCE.md">
<violation number="1" location="README_SOURCE.md:18">
P3: This pull request adds three projects, contrary to the repository’s one-project-per-pull-request contribution rule. Split these additions into separate pull requests, or retain only one project here.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
|
|
||
| _Tools for tracking API evolution and detecting breaking changes between library versions._ | ||
|
|
||
| * [japicmp](https://github.com/siom79/japicmp) - Compares two library JARs and reports source- and binary-incompatible changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P3: This pull request adds three projects, contrary to the repository’s one-project-per-pull-request contribution rule. Split these additions into separate pull requests, or retain only one project here.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At README_SOURCE.md, line 18:
<comment>This pull request adds three projects, contrary to the repository’s one-project-per-pull-request contribution rule. Split these additions into separate pull requests, or retain only one project here.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -11,6 +11,14 @@ Use absolute HTTPS canonical links and submit one project or resource per pull r
+
+_Tools for tracking API evolution and detecting breaking changes between library versions._
+
+* [japicmp](https://github.com/siom79/japicmp) - Compares two library JARs and reports source- and binary-incompatible changes.
+* [Revapi](https://github.com/revapi/revapi) - Extensible API analysis and change tracking with configurable source, binary and semantic compatibility checks.
+* [Roseau](https://github.com/alien-tools/roseau) - Detects source- and binary-breaking changes by comparing library versions from JAR files or source code.
</file context>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds a new API Compatibility category with three maintained, Apache-2.0/MIT tools that track API evolution and breaking changes between versions of Java libraries.
The initial entries are:
Each is used and deployed in practice by maintainers of popular Java libraries, including libraries listed in this very repository. For example, japicmp is used by the the Apache Commons libraries and Google gson, Revapi is used by ical4j and Quarkus, and Roseau is used by JUnit and Caffeine.
Why a new category
Java library maintainers need dedicated tooling to understand how their public API evolves between releases and, in particular, whether changes can break existing consumers. These tools serve a specific purpose and are largely used in practice by Java library maintainers.
This therefore seems analogous to other focused sections in the list: several tools share a clear, independently useful domain that is narrower than the existing general-purpose categories.
Disclosure
I am the main maintainer of Roseau. japicmp and Revapi are independent projects that are also actively used in practice by popular Java library maintainers.
Suggestion type
Checklist
README_SOURCE.md, not the generatedREADME.md.Summary by cubic
Adds an API Compatibility category to the Java/JVM project list, covering japicmp, Revapi, and Roseau for library maintainers tracking API evolution between versions.
Written for commit 482f9ee. Summary will update on new commits.