Repository navigation
docs(go): ship DeepSeek V4.1 Flash limits ($100/$200/$105) to production - #60526
Closed
opencode-agent[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
opencode-agent[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
opencode-agent[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit 34aaa90)
MrMushrooooom
self-requested a review
October 30, 2026 07:39
Contributor
Author
|
Closing: shipping via the normal dev → production promotion (#60524) instead. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ship only the Go limit change from #60515 to
production, without the rest ofdev:opencode.ai/goand the Go docs show DeepSeek V4.1 Flash limits of Go $100, Go Plus $200 and Go Teams $105.This is a cherry-pick of #60515 onto the current
productionhead. It touches onlypackages/console/app/src/component/go-models.tsandservices/www/src/docs/content/console/go.mdx. The content is identical to what's ondev, so the nextdev→productionpromotion won't conflict.Requested by: @MrMushrooooom (Jack via Slack)